[Opm] Oil-water-gas rates at perforation in simulators

[Jørgen Kvalsvik]

That's exactly it, and I'm writing that particular output representation. It's more of a question of being able to implement this conversion in the root wellstate rather than on a case-by-case basis, but it seems I have my answer. Thanks!
________________________________
Fra: Opm [opm-bounces at opm-project.org] på vegne av Atgeirr Rasmussen [Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no]
Sendt: 6. april 2016 11:55
Til: opm at opm-project.org
Emne: Re: [Opm] Oil-water-gas rates at perforation in simulators


6. apr. 2016 kl. 11.48 skrev Jørgen Kvalsvik <JOKVA at statoil.com<mailto:JOKVA at statoil.com>>:

And if I want to support other simulators than Flow? Will all simulators use WellState as a base *and* be able to offer these values?

No.

We could consider a transformation similar to the one done for the reservoir state classes, where the SimulationStateContainer class
now can support more or less arbitrary states, and output facilities can query it for any field in a sensible way.

However I had the impression from other discussions that for wells we were not going that route, but instead creating a data
container for the output facilities' use, and making the existing simulator or state classes able to create such objects.

Atgeirr



-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20160406/c501a21b/attachment.html>