[Opm] Flow-polymer and Eclipse result mismatch
Kai Bao
Kai.Bao at sintef.no
Mon Dec 19 12:31:14 UTC 2016
Hi,
We have done some more investigation in this specific issue and made a few bug fixing and improvements on the flow_polymer through PR https://github.com/OPM/opm-simulators/pull/972 .
The results with benchmark testing cases show perfect matching even when PLMIXPAR != 1.0.
Please rerun your test and let us know how flow_polymer is working with your examples now.
Thanks.
Best,
Kai Bao
________________________________________
From: Opm [opm-bounces at opm-project.org] on behalf of Bao Kai [paeanball at gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2016 1:43 PM
To: Тимур Киреев
Cc: opm at opm-project.org
Subject: Re: [Opm] Flow-polymer and Eclipse result mismatch
Hi,
Welcome to the OPM community first.
It is a known problem and we have not solved it.
We did some tests and investigation, while it looks like it is not that trivial and requires some detailed analysis.
We have not found available time to investigate it further, and contributions will be very welcome.
Best,
Kai Bao
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Тимур Киреев <timuranastasia at gmail.com<mailto:timuranastasia at gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear all,
I have found that changing PLMIXPAR from 1.0 to 0.0 in dataset 'opm-data/polymer_test_suite/simple2D' leads to result mismatch between flow_polymer and Eclipse.
When PLMIXPAR = 1.0 there is a perfect match.
It seems like flow_polymer handles mix parameter improperly.
Has anyone tried to vary this parameter and compare the results with Eclipse?
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
Opm at opm-project.org<mailto:Opm at opm-project.org>
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
More information about the Opm
mailing list