From JOKVA at statoil.com  Mon Jun  6 11:33:38 2016
From: JOKVA at statoil.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F8rgen_Kvalsvik?=)
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 11:33:38 +0000
Subject: [Opm] User-configurable Summary support
Message-ID: <0DE2898B514EE542B05967D975C25F505C4EAA63@WS343.statoil.net>

Hi,

We're almost ready to merge a massive change set to opm-output, and a highlight from that change set is that the new Summary support is switched on. As with all new development we, unfortunately so, have to prepare for bugs and quirks. Sorry about that.

With the apologies out of the way, here's a quick list of known issues or uncertainties.

# Nonsensical values
We're still a bit in limbo when it comes to handling obviously nonsensical values. An example:
Well W1 is a producer, but WWIR water injection rate for all wells is requested. Should we:
* Print 0 (i.e. no injection)
* Print the negative injection (i.e. production) for the well? If the well produces at the rate 2.3, then -2.3 would be printed
* Print a default "undefined" constant?

# Approximately zero
How do we handle values that are essentially zero? The current reference summary file does not print 1.29967e-18 for the water injection rate a timestep for Norne, but the simulator reports this. This can be numerical noise and it can be a tiny rate. What about 1.56839e-09? For reference, these numbers are given as-is by the simulator and read from the simulator's own state, so it's the numbers the simulator works with.

# Known issues and limitations
* Accumulation resets don't work properly yet.
* Only well- and group keywords are supported, and the list is still fairly short

There's likely to be other bugs as well. That being said, the data now written is configurable and plentiful compared to what we had, so I still consider this an improvement. It might be rough in the transition period, but hopefully with more users we'll see rapid improvements.

Happy squashing!


-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20160606/6ae9b36b/attachment.html>

From markus at dr-blatt.de  Wed Jun  8 12:21:01 2016
From: markus at dr-blatt.de (Markus Blatt)
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 14:21:01 +0200
Subject: [Opm] flow: Usage of restart utility
Message-ID: <20160608122101.GB18356@boromir.dr-blatt.de>

Hi,

Tor Harald was so kind and told me how to use the restart utility:

> Yes, that is possible.
>
> Add
>
> RESTART
>  'your_restart_file_name_without_prefix'  time_step_number
> /
> in the solution section in the deck.
>
> Note that you have to chose a time_step_number that is reported.

I am having a hard time finding out that at what time step number of a
report step. I tried a few, but these were all wrong.

Regards,

Markus 
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Hans-Bunte-Str. 8-10, 69123 Heidelberg, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858


From joaho at statoil.com  Wed Jun  8 12:35:48 2016
From: joaho at statoil.com (Joakim Hove)
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 12:35:48 +0000
Subject: [Opm] flow: Usage of restart utility
In-Reply-To: <20160608122101.GB18356@boromir.dr-blatt.de>
References: <20160608122101.GB18356@boromir.dr-blatt.de>
Message-ID: <h7e7fedb3pf2j0budnbik7bk.1465389345858@email.android.com>

The deck should have REPORT STED. Travelling today and tomorrow. Joakim


Sendt fra min Samsung-enhet


-------- Opprinnelig melding --------
Fra: Markus Blatt <markus at dr-blatt.de>
Dato: 08.06.2016 14:21 (GMT+01:00)
Til: opm at opm-project.org
Emne: [Opm] flow: Usage of restart utility

Hi,

Tor Harald was so kind and told me how to use the restart utility:

> Yes, that is possible.
>
> Add
>
> RESTART
>  'your_restart_file_name_without_prefix'  time_step_number
> /
> in the solution section in the deck.
>
> Note that you have to chose a time_step_number that is reported.

I am having a hard time finding out that at what time step number of a
report step. I tried a few, but these were all wrong.

Regards,

Markus
--
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Hans-Bunte-Str. 8-10, 69123 Heidelberg, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
Opm at opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm


-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20160608/055d64c3/attachment.html>

From markus at dr-blatt.de  Wed Jun  8 14:41:02 2016
From: markus at dr-blatt.de (Markus Blatt)
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 16:41:02 +0200
Subject: [Opm] flow: Usage of restart utility
In-Reply-To: <20160608122101.GB18356@boromir.dr-blatt.de>
References: <20160608122101.GB18356@boromir.dr-blatt.de>
Message-ID: <20160608144102.GA1237@boromir.dr-blatt.de>

Hi,
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 02:21:01PM +0200, Markus Blatt wrote:
> 
> I am having a hard time finding out that at what time step number of a
> report step. I tried a few, but these were all wrong.

Joakim helped me a bit and brought me on the right track:

The information is "encrypted" in RPTRST. See
https://github.com/OPM/opm-parser/blob/7ef3a7b4c1db3ff99dc5bf5fbb6ee6ce8504c8b7/opm/parser/eclipse/EclipseState/IOConfig/IOConfig.hpp#L38-L115
for some documentation.

Markus

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Hans-Bunte-Str. 8-10, 69123 Heidelberg, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858


From markus at dr-blatt.de  Wed Jun  8 14:47:16 2016
From: markus at dr-blatt.de (Markus Blatt)
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 16:47:16 +0200
Subject: [Opm] flow: Usage of restart utility
In-Reply-To: <20160608144102.GA1237@boromir.dr-blatt.de>
References: <20160608122101.GB18356@boromir.dr-blatt.de>
 <20160608144102.GA1237@boromir.dr-blatt.de>
Message-ID: <20160608144716.GB1237@boromir.dr-blatt.de>

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 04:41:02PM +0200, Markus Blatt wrote:
> 
> Joakim helped me a bit and brought me on the right track:
> 
> The information is "encrypted" in RPTRST. See
> https://github.com/OPM/opm-parser/blob/7ef3a7b4c1db3ff99dc5bf5fbb6ee6ce8504c8b7/opm/parser/eclipse/EclipseState/IOConfig/IOConfig.hpp#L38-L115
> for some documentation.

My open question is, what is meant by time step. I assume that this is
the simulation step number in the ouput of flow.

Markus
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Hans-Bunte-Str. 8-10, 69123 Heidelberg, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858


From Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no  Thu Jun  9 06:45:20 2016
From: Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no (Atgeirr Rasmussen)
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 06:45:20 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Talks from OPM meeting now available
Message-ID: <B34470ED-2AE0-4D1A-AD4A-0499893FFE86@sintef.no>

The slides from the recent OPM meeting in Oslo have been uploaded to the OPM web site:

http://opm-project.org/?page_id=39


Atgeirr

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20160609/29fa468a/attachment.html>

From joakim.hove at gmail.com  Thu Jun  9 16:15:43 2016
From: joakim.hove at gmail.com (Joakim Hove)
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 18:15:43 +0200
Subject: [Opm] flow: Usage of restart utility
In-Reply-To: <20160608144716.GB1237@boromir.dr-blatt.de>
References: <20160608122101.GB18356@boromir.dr-blatt.de>
 <20160608144102.GA1237@boromir.dr-blatt.de>
 <20160608144716.GB1237@boromir.dr-blatt.de>
Message-ID: <CALKD1M-5mt0nK148eAbReswEdwT8Zu6BeRx6gFD9paoo-jLYYw@mail.gmail.com>

>
>
> My open question is, what is meant by time step. I assume that this is
> the simulation step number in the ouput of flow.



OK;

this is my mental picture of the timeline in an ECLIPSE simulation:


X  : Report step - given with the DATES or TSTEP kewyord in the Schedule
section of the input file.
 |  :  A timestep chosen by the adaptive timestep algorithm

X-------|------|----|---|--X------|---|----|-----X--------|--------X
[](                        ](                     ](                 ]
0                          1                     2                 3

This is a simulation with three report steps 1,2 & 3 and in addition there
is an initial report step 0 which only contains the initial equilibrium
solution. Observe the half open intervals (...] indicated under the
timeline, there we see that the results which 'happen'  in the timeinterval
(R-1,R] are attached to report step R - but the report step 0 is a
singularity - spanning the time interval [0,0]. Understanding these
intervals is most important when it comes to summary files, where we have
results for all simulator timesteps - but they are "attached" to report
steps as indicated above.

All IO configuration is in terms of report steps, so the comment
<https://github.com/OPM/opm-parser/blob/7ef3a7b4c1db3ff99dc5bf5fbb6ee6ce8504c8b7/opm/parser/eclipse/EclipseState/IOConfig/IOConfig.hpp#L38>s
you
linked to are unfortunately misleading - every single[1] occurence of
'timestep' in the RPTRST configuration should be replaced with REPORT STEP.

HTH - Joakim

 [1]: Of course - there is always an exception, there  is a RPTRST setting
( Ithink it is BASIC=6) which will actually get utput for every simulator
timestep - that is not supported in flow.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20160609/aa1a2ef5/attachment.html>

From joakim.hove at gmail.com  Thu Jun  9 16:18:39 2016
From: joakim.hove at gmail.com (Joakim Hove)
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 18:18:39 +0200
Subject: [Opm] flow: Usage of restart utility
In-Reply-To: <CALKD1M-5mt0nK148eAbReswEdwT8Zu6BeRx6gFD9paoo-jLYYw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160608122101.GB18356@boromir.dr-blatt.de>
 <20160608144102.GA1237@boromir.dr-blatt.de>
 <20160608144716.GB1237@boromir.dr-blatt.de>
 <CALKD1M-5mt0nK148eAbReswEdwT8Zu6BeRx6gFD9paoo-jLYYw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALKD1M_AmVxCrpx0vphFuD+tZ-+JBhVQTTD9GzfO_hoOeq45GA@mail.gmail.com>

>
>
> OK;
>
>
> this is my mental picture of the timeline in an ECLIPSE simulation:
>
>
> X  : Report step - given with the DATES or TSTEP kewyord in the Schedule
> section of the input file.
>  |  :  A timestep chosen by the adaptive timestep algorithm
>
> X-------|------|----|---|--X------|---|----|-----X--------|--------X
> [](                        ](                     ](                 ]
> 0                          1                     2                 3
>


OK - that probably did not line up perfectly in your email - client; the
lines should be aligned so that the square braces come immediately below
the report step indicators (X), and the numbers 1,2,3 should come right
beneath that again.

Sorry for the spam.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20160609/b45d8964/attachment.html>

From dogbe at aust.edu.ng  Tue Jun 14 01:57:48 2016
From: dogbe at aust.edu.ng (David Ogbe)
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 02:57:48 +0100
Subject: [Opm] Aquifer models
Message-ID: <CAHaEc_W9j0NGnNp2gFR-a-pNQyPiPrk8cL8G7xhiTjgfexn_wA@mail.gmail.com>

Any analytical aquifer models like Carter Tracey or van Everdingen-Hurst in
flow?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20160614/33ea0751/attachment.html>

From Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no  Tue Jun 14 08:05:09 2016
From: Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no (Atgeirr Rasmussen)
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:05:09 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Aquifer models
In-Reply-To: <CAHaEc_W9j0NGnNp2gFR-a-pNQyPiPrk8cL8G7xhiTjgfexn_wA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHaEc_W9j0NGnNp2gFR-a-pNQyPiPrk8cL8G7xhiTjgfexn_wA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <B8CEDDA4-1429-478E-9E89-40BE376EDEC2@sintef.no>


14. jun. 2016 kl. 03.57 skrev David Ogbe <dogbe at aust.edu.ng<mailto:dogbe at aust.edu.ng>>:


Any analytical aquifer models like Carter Tracey or van Everdingen-Hurst in flow?

No-one have implemented any such models yet. It would be very appreciated.
If you would like to contribute an implementation please ask questions, and we'll
try to help!

Atgeirr



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20160614/0add1857/attachment.html>

From JOKVA at statoil.com  Tue Jun 14 12:50:00 2016
From: JOKVA at statoil.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F8rgen_Kvalsvik?=)
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:50:00 +0000
Subject: [Opm] opm module dependency graph changed
Message-ID: <0DE2898B514EE542B05967D975C25F505C4F4C89@WS343.statoil.net>

Hi,

Recent changes have made opm-core dependent on opm-output, and opm-output does no longer depend on opm-core. If you're building master from source, please make sure to update your repositories, clean out your build caches and build opm-output before you build opm-core.

- Jørgen


-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20160614/36db3651/attachment.html>

From dogbe at aust.edu.ng  Wed Jun 15 12:55:38 2016
From: dogbe at aust.edu.ng (David Ogbe)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 13:55:38 +0100
Subject: [Opm] Property Elements Outside valid limits
Message-ID: <CAHaEc_Uqo=sEBgUmtYzjywZG8w6PH24Zv1PCBDtuORn6Uaz7iA@mail.gmail.com>

I am trying to run opm flow simulator to initialize an eclipse data set.
The error message  I get is something like "property elements outside valid
limits".
What does this error message mean? Where can I see the property elements
 and the limits established?
 Is this related to some dimensions of a table or array? If so, what
table/array size/dimensions do I need to adjust? The *.PRT file does not
contain any thing useful to decipher the error message. Thanks for your
help.

-- 
====================================================
Prof. David O. Ogbe, Ph.D.,PE
Email:  dogbe at aust.edu.ng
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20160615/2d6624da/attachment.html>

From Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no  Wed Jun 15 13:08:00 2016
From: Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no (Atgeirr Rasmussen)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 13:08:00 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Property Elements Outside valid limits
In-Reply-To: <CAHaEc_Uqo=sEBgUmtYzjywZG8w6PH24Zv1PCBDtuORn6Uaz7iA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHaEc_Uqo=sEBgUmtYzjywZG8w6PH24Zv1PCBDtuORn6Uaz7iA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <EDD5F01A-9D56-4688-BD79-91007E6193DF@sintef.no>


> 15. jun. 2016 kl. 14.55 skrev David Ogbe <dogbe at aust.edu.ng>:
> 
> I am trying to run opm flow simulator to initialize an eclipse data set. The error message  I get is something like "property elements outside valid limits".
> What does this error message mean? Where can I see the property elements  and the limits established?
>  Is this related to some dimensions of a table or array? If so, what table/array size/dimensions do I need to adjust? The *.PRT file does not contain any thing useful to decipher the error message. Thanks for your help.

Please supply the full error message, including at least a few lines above and below, and we'll try to diagnose your problem.

Atgeirr



From rohith.nair at tno.nl  Wed Jun 15 13:39:00 2016
From: rohith.nair at tno.nl (Nair, R. (Rohith))
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 13:39:00 +0000
Subject: [Opm] FW: [Help] Convergence issues - FLOW
Message-ID: <F02837569CCB6F4E87FA137CB24612E90F12A1CD@EXC-MBX02.tsn.tno.nl>

Dear OPM community,

At the recently held OPM meeting I had mentioned that we at TNO are facing convergence issues with FLOW when using perturbed schedule files and also with handling well openings (Note: ECLIPSE is able to deal with these perturbed schedule files). I believe it was mentioned that you guys were already working towards a fix for these sort of issues. We would appreciate your help/suggestions/workarounds in solving these convergence issues and ultimately improving the robustness of the FLOW simulator in the process.

Please find the relevant data available for download from the following link: https://we.tl/OBTYWPLnwg

The download contains:


1.       Failed simulation with FLOW for simple water injection rate optimization (successful simulation is also included): The only difference between the successful and failed simulation is different water injection rates

2.       Failed simulation where wells are opened at predefined intervals

3.       Benchmark plots which successfully compare FLOW with other simulators(E100, MRST, Mores, AD-GPRS) for oil-water flow simulation

Thanks and Kind regards,
Rohith Nair





























This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20160615/041c48e2/attachment.html>

From abir at statoil.com  Wed Jun 15 14:27:35 2016
From: abir at statoil.com (Alf Birger Rustad)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 14:27:35 +0000
Subject: [Opm] FW: [Help] Convergence issues - FLOW
In-Reply-To: <F02837569CCB6F4E87FA137CB24612E90F12A1CD@EXC-MBX02.tsn.tno.nl>
References: <F02837569CCB6F4E87FA137CB24612E90F12A1CD@EXC-MBX02.tsn.tno.nl>
Message-ID: <3FF3DEAF482AE047BE357963DF9C4F8AB48F52E1@WS319.statoil.net>

Hi Rohith,

One thing you can try right away is the new switch for ignoring convergence failure for the linear solver. On the command line or in a parameter file you can add:
linear_solver_ignoreconvergencefailure=true

Cheers,
Alf

________________________________
From: Opm [opm-bounces at opm-project.org] on behalf of Nair, R. (Rohith) [rohith.nair at tno.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 3:39 PM
To: opm at opm-project.org
Subject: [Opm] FW: [Help] Convergence issues - FLOW

Dear OPM community,

At the recently held OPM meeting I had mentioned that we at TNO are facing convergence issues with FLOW when using perturbed schedule files and also with handling well openings (Note: ECLIPSE is able to deal with these perturbed schedule files). I believe it was mentioned that you guys were already working towards a fix for these sort of issues. We would appreciate your help/suggestions/workarounds in solving these convergence issues and ultimately improving the robustness of the FLOW simulator in the process.

Please find the relevant data available for download from the following link: https://we.tl/OBTYWPLnwg

The download contains:


1.       Failed simulation with FLOW for simple water injection rate optimization (successful simulation is also included): The only difference between the successful and failed simulation is different water injection rates

2.       Failed simulation where wells are opened at predefined intervals

3.       Benchmark plots which successfully compare FLOW with other simulators(E100, MRST, Mores, AD-GPRS) for oil-water flow simulation

Thanks and Kind regards,
Rohith Nair






























This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.



-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20160615/bc279546/attachment.html>

From dogbe at aust.edu.ng  Wed Jun 15 17:00:14 2016
From: dogbe at aust.edu.ng (David Ogbe)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:00:14 +0100
Subject: [Opm] Property Elements Outside valid limits
In-Reply-To: <EDD5F01A-9D56-4688-BD79-91007E6193DF@sintef.no>
References: <CAHaEc_Uqo=sEBgUmtYzjywZG8w6PH24Zv1PCBDtuORn6Uaz7iA@mail.gmail.com>
 <EDD5F01A-9D56-4688-BD79-91007E6193DF@sintef.no>
Message-ID: <CAHaEc_W4cJzRnvdiMGZi_irzymtA6gitcY=qYPa=zUaYNQf=rg@mail.gmail.com>

Here is the screen shot from my run.

flg2 at flg2-VirtualBox:~/opm-data-master/opmdoo$ flow doo_13.DATA
**********************************************************************
*                                                                    *
*                   This is Flow (version 2016.04)                   *
*                                                                    *
* Flow is a simulator for fully implicit three-phase black-oil flow, *
*            and is part of OPM. For more information see:           *
*                       http://opm-project.org                       *
*                                                                    *
**********************************************************************

---------------    Reading parameters     ---------------
output not found. Using default value 'true'.
output_dir not found. Using default value 'output'.
deck_filename found at /, value is doo_13.DATA
Failed to create valid EclipseState object. See logfile: doo_13.PRT
Exception caught: Property element outside valid limits
Program threw an exception: Property element outside valid limits
flg2 at flg2-VirtualBox:~/opm-data-master/opmdoo$

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2322-b>
Virus-free
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2322-b>
<#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On 15 June 2016 at 14:08, Atgeirr Rasmussen <Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no>
wrote:

>
> > 15. jun. 2016 kl. 14.55 skrev David Ogbe <dogbe at aust.edu.ng>:
> >
> > I am trying to run opm flow simulator to initialize an eclipse data set.
> The error message  I get is something like "property elements outside valid
> limits".
> > What does this error message mean? Where can I see the property
> elements  and the limits established?
> >  Is this related to some dimensions of a table or array? If so, what
> table/array size/dimensions do I need to adjust? The *.PRT file does not
> contain any thing useful to decipher the error message. Thanks for your
> help.
>
> Please supply the full error message, including at least a few lines above
> and below, and we'll try to diagnose your problem.
>
> Atgeirr
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opm mailing list
> Opm at opm-project.org
> http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
>



-- 
====================================================
Prof. David O. Ogbe, Ph.D., PE
Visiting Professor & Head/Coordinator of Petroleum Engineering
African University of Science & Technology
KM 10, Airport Road, Galadimawa Abuja-Nigeria
P.M.B. 681, Garki-Abuja, FCT, Nigeria
Email:  dogbe at aust.edu.ng  Tel: +2348058643856  www.aust.edu.ng
Email2: dogreatland at gmail.com   Tel2: +2347045421760
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20160615/959b86e0/attachment.html>

From Bard.Skaflestad at sintef.no  Wed Jun 15 17:11:50 2016
From: Bard.Skaflestad at sintef.no (=?iso-8859-1?Q?B=E5rd_Skaflestad?=)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:11:50 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Property Elements Outside valid limits
In-Reply-To: <CAHaEc_W4cJzRnvdiMGZi_irzymtA6gitcY=qYPa=zUaYNQf=rg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHaEc_Uqo=sEBgUmtYzjywZG8w6PH24Zv1PCBDtuORn6Uaz7iA@mail.gmail.com>
 <EDD5F01A-9D56-4688-BD79-91007E6193DF@sintef.no>,
 <CAHaEc_W4cJzRnvdiMGZi_irzymtA6gitcY=qYPa=zUaYNQf=rg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <12B771AE701C544CB8C32192333A02CD015B74A492@SINTEFEXMBX04.sintef.no>

Hi David,

At the risk of stating the obvious, what does the log file (doo_13.PRT) say about the case?

The diagnostic you quote is printed from a single location within the deck input parser and signifies that some vector's minimum value is below a minimum threshold or its maximum value is above some maximum threshold.


Sincerely,
--
Bård Skaflestad <Bard.Skaflestad at sintef.no>
SINTEF ICT, Applied Mathematics


________________________________
From: Opm [opm-bounces at opm-project.org] on behalf of David Ogbe [dogbe at aust.edu.ng]
Sent: 15 June 2016 19:00
To: Atgeirr Rasmussen
Cc: Opm at opm-project.org
Subject: Re: [Opm] Property Elements Outside valid limits

Here is the screen shot from my run.

flg2 at flg2-VirtualBox:~/opm-data-master/opmdoo$ flow doo_13.DATA
**********************************************************************
*                                                                    *
*                   This is Flow (version 2016.04)                   *
*                                                                    *
* Flow is a simulator for fully implicit three-phase black-oil flow, *
*            and is part of OPM. For more information see:           *
*                       http://opm-project.org<redir.aspx?REF=LUwnLx79p4NixRAdBksRG8BN7c8RZ68uE_D27n14jYSdX2s2P5XTCAFodHRwOi8vb3BtLXByb2plY3Qub3Jn>                       *
*                                                                    *
**********************************************************************

---------------    Reading parameters     ---------------
output not found. Using default value 'true'.
output_dir not found. Using default value 'output'.
deck_filename found at /, value is doo_13.DATA
Failed to create valid EclipseState object. See logfile: doo_13.PRT
Exception caught: Property element outside valid limits
Program threw an exception: Property element outside valid limits
flg2 at flg2-VirtualBox:~/opm-data-master/opmdoo$

[X]<redir.aspx?REF=34OA5hksKz5iA7miz5RPSJMOppToUyiJelbytZeHeYCdX2s2P5XTCAFodHRwczovL3d3dy5hdmFzdC5jb20vc2lnLWVtYWlsP3V0bV9tZWRpdW09ZW1haWwmdXRtX3NvdXJjZT1saW5rJnV0bV9jYW1wYWlnbj1zaWctZW1haWwmdXRtX2NvbnRlbnQ9d2VibWFpbCZ1dG1fdGVybT1vYS0yMzIyLWI.>    Virus-free<redir.aspx?REF=34OA5hksKz5iA7miz5RPSJMOppToUyiJelbytZeHeYCdX2s2P5XTCAFodHRwczovL3d3dy5hdmFzdC5jb20vc2lnLWVtYWlsP3V0bV9tZWRpdW09ZW1haWwmdXRtX3NvdXJjZT1saW5rJnV0bV9jYW1wYWlnbj1zaWctZW1haWwmdXRtX2NvbnRlbnQ9d2VibWFpbCZ1dG1fdGVybT1vYS0yMzIyLWI.>

On 15 June 2016 at 14:08, Atgeirr Rasmussen <Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no<redir.aspx?REF=5rdkZ4uEaFZhElm55X_sobInlone8Xi40FDbW1AvrQmdX2s2P5XTCAFtYWlsdG86QXRnZWlyci5SYXNtdXNzZW5Ac2ludGVmLm5v>> wrote:

> 15. jun. 2016 kl. 14.55 skrev David Ogbe <dogbe at aust.edu.ng<redir.aspx?REF=gSetNqLGZQ7BieyMe5CepaAJs7zEvS8baSJxy6ra26CdX2s2P5XTCAFtYWlsdG86ZG9nYmVAYXVzdC5lZHUubmc.>>:
>
> I am trying to run opm flow simulator to initialize an eclipse data set. The error message  I get is something like "property elements outside valid limits".
> What does this error message mean? Where can I see the property elements  and the limits established?
>  Is this related to some dimensions of a table or array? If so, what table/array size/dimensions do I need to adjust? The *.PRT file does not contain any thing useful to decipher the error message. Thanks for your help.

Please supply the full error message, including at least a few lines above and below, and we'll try to diagnose your problem.

Atgeirr

_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
Opm at opm-project.org<redir.aspx?REF=p7eEBI0omHiHUl0sObHNOm9lbqs9pAnE8Fp1jxk3AGCdX2s2P5XTCAFtYWlsdG86T3BtQG9wbS1wcm9qZWN0Lm9yZw..>
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm<redir.aspx?REF=OH1mFypSBUzS9HpE5SYBb8dPLRN3Pj6gxGCHvlrzfXidX2s2P5XTCAFodHRwOi8vb3BtLXByb2plY3Qub3JnL2NnaS1iaW4vbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9vcG0.>



--
====================================================
Prof. David O. Ogbe, Ph.D., PE
Visiting Professor & Head/Coordinator of Petroleum Engineering
African University of Science & Technology
KM 10, Airport Road, Galadimawa Abuja-Nigeria
P.M.B. 681, Garki-Abuja, FCT, Nigeria
Email:  dogbe at aust.edu.ng<redir.aspx?REF=gSetNqLGZQ7BieyMe5CepaAJs7zEvS8baSJxy6ra26CdX2s2P5XTCAFtYWlsdG86ZG9nYmVAYXVzdC5lZHUubmc.>  Tel: +2348058643856  www.aust.edu.ng<redir.aspx?REF=-z_W6-lz_jvZ_tMvZ_d7gOr-BIGaiGZgOr5ILMNyw9mdX2s2P5XTCAFodHRwOi8vd3d3LmF1c3QuZWR1Lm5n>
Email2: dogreatland at gmail.com<redir.aspx?REF=9ytPu-b95laXP_Rh-3GKKokLqu2Gmk3c26OvQKRsVIadX2s2P5XTCAFtYWlsdG86ZG9ncmVhdGxhbmRAZ21haWwuY29t>   Tel2: +2347045421760
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20160615/4996c66a/attachment.html>

From joaho at statoil.com  Wed Jun 15 17:12:50 2016
From: joaho at statoil.com (Joakim Hove)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:12:50 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Property Elements Outside valid limits
In-Reply-To: <CAHaEc_W4cJzRnvdiMGZi_irzymtA6gitcY=qYPa=zUaYNQf=rg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHaEc_Uqo=sEBgUmtYzjywZG8w6PH24Zv1PCBDtuORn6Uaz7iA@mail.gmail.com>
 <EDD5F01A-9D56-4688-BD79-91007E6193DF@sintef.no>
 <CAHaEc_W4cJzRnvdiMGZi_irzymtA6gitcY=qYPa=zUaYNQf=rg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2C495325BE67E94ABEF4C1C984227EF081526611@WS343.statoil.net>

OK;

This error is triggered here: https://github.com/OPM/opm-parser/blob/621a8c9f676d828d6a3c63d5a463291f8918719c/opm/parser/eclipse/EclipseState/Grid/GridProperty.cpp#L342


The only callsites are here: https://github.com/OPM/opm-parser/blob/68c7bede0b65ac1a658182268e2aa12c413ecc84/opm/parser/eclipse/EclipseState/Grid/SatfuncPropertyInitializers.cpp#L697 and

Here: https://github.com/OPM/opm-parser/blob/68c7bede0b65ac1a658182268e2aa12c413ecc84/opm/parser/eclipse/EclipseState/Grid/SatfuncPropertyInitializers.cpp#L743’


So my conclusion is that either your SATNUM field or the IMBUN field has numerical values which extend beyond the number of tables you have specied with the (PVTNUM I think) Keyword – or there is a bug in our code. Can you share your deck?

Joakim

From: Opm [mailto:opm-bounces at opm-project.org] On Behalf Of David Ogbe
Sent: 15. juni 2016 19:00
To: Atgeirr Rasmussen
Cc: Opm at opm-project.org
Subject: Re: [Opm] Property Elements Outside valid limits

Here is the screen shot from my run.

flg2 at flg2-VirtualBox:~/opm-data-master/opmdoo$ flow doo_13.DATA
**********************************************************************
*                                                                    *
*                   This is Flow (version 2016.04)                   *
*                                                                    *
* Flow is a simulator for fully implicit three-phase black-oil flow, *
*            and is part of OPM. For more information see:           *
*                       http://opm-project.org                       *
*                                                                    *
**********************************************************************

---------------    Reading parameters     ---------------
output not found. Using default value 'true'.
output_dir not found. Using default value 'output'.
deck_filename found at /, value is doo_13.DATA
Failed to create valid EclipseState object. See logfile: doo_13.PRT
Exception caught: Property element outside valid limits
Program threw an exception: Property element outside valid limits
flg2 at flg2-VirtualBox:~/opm-data-master/opmdoo$

[https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/2016/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange_184x116-v1.png]<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2322-b>

Virus-free<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2322-b>


On 15 June 2016 at 14:08, Atgeirr Rasmussen <Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no<mailto:Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no>> wrote:

> 15. jun. 2016 kl. 14.55 skrev David Ogbe <dogbe at aust.edu.ng<mailto:dogbe at aust.edu.ng>>:
>
> I am trying to run opm flow simulator to initialize an eclipse data set. The error message  I get is something like "property elements outside valid limits".
> What does this error message mean? Where can I see the property elements  and the limits established?
>  Is this related to some dimensions of a table or array? If so, what table/array size/dimensions do I need to adjust? The *.PRT file does not contain any thing useful to decipher the error message. Thanks for your help.

Please supply the full error message, including at least a few lines above and below, and we'll try to diagnose your problem.

Atgeirr

_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
Opm at opm-project.org<mailto:Opm at opm-project.org>
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm



--
====================================================
Prof. David O. Ogbe, Ph.D., PE
Visiting Professor & Head/Coordinator of Petroleum Engineering
African University of Science & Technology
KM 10, Airport Road, Galadimawa Abuja-Nigeria
P.M.B. 681, Garki-Abuja, FCT, Nigeria
Email:  dogbe at aust.edu.ng<mailto:dogbe at aust.edu.ng>  Tel: +2348058643856  www.aust.edu.ng<http://www.aust.edu.ng>
Email2: dogreatland at gmail.com<mailto:dogreatland at gmail.com>   Tel2: +2347045421760


-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20160615/0fe3468b/attachment.html>

From dogbe at aust.edu.ng  Wed Jun 15 17:28:51 2016
From: dogbe at aust.edu.ng (David Ogbe)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:28:51 +0100
Subject: [Opm] Property Elements Outside valid limits
In-Reply-To: <2C495325BE67E94ABEF4C1C984227EF081526611@WS343.statoil.net>
References: <CAHaEc_Uqo=sEBgUmtYzjywZG8w6PH24Zv1PCBDtuORn6Uaz7iA@mail.gmail.com>
 <EDD5F01A-9D56-4688-BD79-91007E6193DF@sintef.no>
 <CAHaEc_W4cJzRnvdiMGZi_irzymtA6gitcY=qYPa=zUaYNQf=rg@mail.gmail.com>
 <2C495325BE67E94ABEF4C1C984227EF081526611@WS343.statoil.net>
Message-ID: <CAHaEc_VAwc98LNLuS6p3QvAcKjzm_dwF1JCfCKndjgqA9eCp_A@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks. I will review the SATNUM data. And let you know how it goes.

On 15 June 2016 at 18:12, Joakim Hove <joaho at statoil.com> wrote:

> OK;
>
>
>
> This error is triggered here:
> https://github.com/OPM/opm-parser/blob/621a8c9f676d828d6a3c63d5a463291f8918719c/opm/parser/eclipse/EclipseState/Grid/GridProperty.cpp#L342
>
>
>
>
>
> The only callsites are here:
> https://github.com/OPM/opm-parser/blob/68c7bede0b65ac1a658182268e2aa12c413ecc84/opm/parser/eclipse/EclipseState/Grid/SatfuncPropertyInitializers.cpp#L697
> and
>
>
>
> Here:
> https://github.com/OPM/opm-parser/blob/68c7bede0b65ac1a658182268e2aa12c413ecc84/opm/parser/eclipse/EclipseState/Grid/SatfuncPropertyInitializers.cpp#L743
> ’
>
>
>
>
>
> So my conclusion is that either your SATNUM field or the IMBUN field has
> numerical values which extend beyond the number of tables you have specied
> with the (PVTNUM I think) Keyword – or there is a bug in our code. Can you
> share your deck?
>
>
>
> Joakim
>
>
>
> *From:* Opm [mailto:opm-bounces at opm-project.org] *On Behalf Of *David Ogbe
> *Sent:* 15. juni 2016 19:00
> *To:* Atgeirr Rasmussen
> *Cc:* Opm at opm-project.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Opm] Property Elements Outside valid limits
>
>
>
> Here is the screen shot from my run.
>
>
>
> flg2 at flg2-VirtualBox:~/opm-data-master/opmdoo$ flow doo_13.DATA
>
> **********************************************************************
>
> *                                                                    *
>
> *                   This is Flow (version 2016.04)                   *
>
> *                                                                    *
>
> * Flow is a simulator for fully implicit three-phase black-oil flow, *
>
> *            and is part of OPM. For more information see:           *
>
> *                       http://opm-project.org                       *
>
> *                                                                    *
>
> **********************************************************************
>
>
>
> ---------------    Reading parameters     ---------------
>
> output not found. Using default value 'true'.
>
> output_dir not found. Using default value 'output'.
>
> deck_filename found at /, value is doo_13.DATA
>
> Failed to create valid EclipseState object. See logfile: doo_13.PRT
>
> Exception caught: Property element outside valid limits
>
> Program threw an exception: Property element outside valid limits
>
> flg2 at flg2-VirtualBox:~/opm-data-master/opmdoo$
>
>
>
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2322-b>
>
> Virus-free
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2322-b>
>
>
>
> On 15 June 2016 at 14:08, Atgeirr Rasmussen <Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no>
> wrote:
>
>
> > 15. jun. 2016 kl. 14.55 skrev David Ogbe <dogbe at aust.edu.ng>:
> >
> > I am trying to run opm flow simulator to initialize an eclipse data set.
> The error message  I get is something like "property elements outside valid
> limits".
> > What does this error message mean? Where can I see the property
> elements  and the limits established?
> >  Is this related to some dimensions of a table or array? If so, what
> table/array size/dimensions do I need to adjust? The *.PRT file does not
> contain any thing useful to decipher the error message. Thanks for your
> help.
>
> Please supply the full error message, including at least a few lines above
> and below, and we'll try to diagnose your problem.
>
> Atgeirr
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opm mailing list
> Opm at opm-project.org
> http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ====================================================
>
> Prof. David O. Ogbe, Ph.D., PE
>
> Visiting Professor & Head/Coordinator of Petroleum Engineering
>
> African University of Science & Technology
>
> KM 10, Airport Road, Galadimawa Abuja-Nigeria
>
> P.M.B. 681, Garki-Abuja, FCT, Nigeria
>
> Email:  dogbe at aust.edu.ng  Tel: +2348058643856  www.aust.edu.ng
>
> Email2: dogreatland at gmail.com   Tel2: +2347045421760
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
> information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
> addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
> this message.
> Thank you
>



-- 
====================================================
Prof. David O. Ogbe, Ph.D., PE
Visiting Professor & Head/Coordinator of Petroleum Engineering
African University of Science & Technology
KM 10, Airport Road, Galadimawa Abuja-Nigeria
P.M.B. 681, Garki-Abuja, FCT, Nigeria
Email:  dogbe at aust.edu.ng  Tel: +2348058643856  www.aust.edu.ng
Email2: dogreatland at gmail.com   Tel2: +2347045421760
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20160615/69a0aefd/attachment.html>

From rohith.nair at tno.nl  Tue Jun 21 11:18:09 2016
From: rohith.nair at tno.nl (Nair, R. (Rohith))
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:18:09 +0000
Subject: [Opm] FW: [Help] Convergence issues - FLOW
In-Reply-To: <3FF3DEAF482AE047BE357963DF9C4F8AB48F52E1@WS319.statoil.net>
References: <F02837569CCB6F4E87FA137CB24612E90F12A1CD@EXC-MBX02.tsn.tno.nl>
 <3FF3DEAF482AE047BE357963DF9C4F8AB48F52E1@WS319.statoil.net>
Message-ID: <F02837569CCB6F4E87FA137CB24612E90F12B49E@EXC-MBX02.tsn.tno.nl>

Hi Alf,

The switch linear_solver_ignoreconvergencefailure=true doesn't seem to help in this case.

Additionally, a deck file (https://gist.github.com/nairr/8dbe35141a7b93dda90a1babd462b843 ) which used to run with FLOW_2016.04_stablerelease, gives the following error with FLOW_2016.04_current:  Floating point exception (core dumped). I think the same issue has been referenced in opm-simulators #731.

Cheers,
Rohith

From: Alf Birger Rustad [mailto:abir at statoil.com]
Sent: woensdag 15 juni 2016 16:28
To: Nair, R. (Rohith); opm at opm-project.org
Subject: RE: [Opm] FW: [Help] Convergence issues - FLOW

Hi Rohith,

One thing you can try right away is the new switch for ignoring convergence failure for the linear solver. On the command line or in a parameter file you can add:
linear_solver_ignoreconvergencefailure=true

Cheers,
Alf
________________________________
From: Opm [opm-bounces at opm-project.org] on behalf of Nair, R. (Rohith) [rohith.nair at tno.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 3:39 PM
To: opm at opm-project.org<mailto:opm at opm-project.org>
Subject: [Opm] FW: [Help] Convergence issues - FLOW
Dear OPM community,

At the recently held OPM meeting I had mentioned that we at TNO are facing convergence issues with FLOW when using perturbed schedule files and also with handling well openings (Note: ECLIPSE is able to deal with these perturbed schedule files). I believe it was mentioned that you guys were already working towards a fix for these sort of issues. We would appreciate your help/suggestions/workarounds in solving these convergence issues and ultimately improving the robustness of the FLOW simulator in the process.

Please find the relevant data available for download from the following link: https://we.tl/OBTYWPLnwg

The download contains:


1.       Failed simulation with FLOW for simple water injection rate optimization (successful simulation is also included): The only difference between the successful and failed simulation is different water injection rates

2.       Failed simulation where wells are opened at predefined intervals

3.       Benchmark plots which successfully compare FLOW with other simulators(E100, MRST, Mores, AD-GPRS) for oil-water flow simulation

Thanks and Kind regards,
Rohith Nair
This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20160621/2d733a1d/attachment.html>

From abir at statoil.com  Tue Jun 21 12:52:49 2016
From: abir at statoil.com (Alf Birger Rustad)
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:52:49 +0000
Subject: [Opm] FW: [Help] Convergence issues - FLOW
In-Reply-To: <F02837569CCB6F4E87FA137CB24612E90F12B49E@EXC-MBX02.tsn.tno.nl>
References: <F02837569CCB6F4E87FA137CB24612E90F12A1CD@EXC-MBX02.tsn.tno.nl>
 <3FF3DEAF482AE047BE357963DF9C4F8AB48F52E1@WS319.statoil.net>,
 <F02837569CCB6F4E87FA137CB24612E90F12B49E@EXC-MBX02.tsn.tno.nl>
Message-ID: <3FF3DEAF482AE047BE357963DF9C4F8AB48FDC4E@WS319.statoil.net>

Thanks for testing Rohith, we will need to find time to go through your cases.

Cheers,
Alf

________________________________
From: Opm [opm-bounces at opm-project.org] on behalf of Nair, R. (Rohith) [rohith.nair at tno.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 1:18 PM
To: Alf Birger Rustad; opm at opm-project.org
Subject: Re: [Opm] FW: [Help] Convergence issues - FLOW

Hi Alf,

The switch linear_solver_ignoreconvergencefailure=true doesn’t seem to help in this case.

Additionally, a deck file (https://gist.github.com/nairr/8dbe35141a7b93dda90a1babd462b843 ) which used to run with FLOW_2016.04_stablerelease, gives the following error with FLOW_2016.04_current:  Floating point exception (core dumped). I think the same issue has been referenced in opm-simulators #731.

Cheers,
Rohith

From: Alf Birger Rustad [mailto:abir at statoil.com]
Sent: woensdag 15 juni 2016 16:28
To: Nair, R. (Rohith); opm at opm-project.org
Subject: RE: [Opm] FW: [Help] Convergence issues - FLOW

Hi Rohith,

One thing you can try right away is the new switch for ignoring convergence failure for the linear solver. On the command line or in a parameter file you can add:
linear_solver_ignoreconvergencefailure=true

Cheers,
Alf
________________________________
From: Opm [opm-bounces at opm-project.org] on behalf of Nair, R. (Rohith) [rohith.nair at tno.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 3:39 PM
To: opm at opm-project.org<mailto:opm at opm-project.org>
Subject: [Opm] FW: [Help] Convergence issues - FLOW
Dear OPM community,

At the recently held OPM meeting I had mentioned that we at TNO are facing convergence issues with FLOW when using perturbed schedule files and also with handling well openings (Note: ECLIPSE is able to deal with these perturbed schedule files). I believe it was mentioned that you guys were already working towards a fix for these sort of issues. We would appreciate your help/suggestions/workarounds in solving these convergence issues and ultimately improving the robustness of the FLOW simulator in the process.

Please find the relevant data available for download from the following link: https://we.tl/OBTYWPLnwg

The download contains:


1.       Failed simulation with FLOW for simple water injection rate optimization (successful simulation is also included): The only difference between the successful and failed simulation is different water injection rates

2.       Failed simulation where wells are opened at predefined intervals

3.       Benchmark plots which successfully compare FLOW with other simulators(E100, MRST, Mores, AD-GPRS) for oil-water flow simulation

Thanks and Kind regards,
Rohith Nair

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.



-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20160621/baf4219c/attachment.html>

From arne.morten.kvarving at sintef.no  Mon Jun 27 12:59:22 2016
From: arne.morten.kvarving at sintef.no (Arne Morten Kvarving)
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:59:22 +0200
Subject: [Opm] jenkins downtime
Message-ID: <5771232A.4030506@sintef.no>

hi,

i will have to take jenkins down for a while at the end of the day 
(1630-ish CET).

i need to build trilinos (for zoltan) and memory is exhausted with jobs 
running in parallel.
hopefully the downtime won't last long.

arnem


From Bard.Skaflestad at sintef.no  Mon Jun 27 13:05:22 2016
From: Bard.Skaflestad at sintef.no (=?iso-8859-1?Q?B=E5rd_Skaflestad?=)
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 13:05:22 +0000
Subject: [Opm] jenkins downtime
In-Reply-To: <5771232A.4030506@sintef.no>
References: <5771232A.4030506@sintef.no>
Message-ID: <12B771AE701C544CB8C32192333A02CD015B7F4B64@SINTEFEXMBX04.sintef.no>

Just out of curiosity: If there are any builds running at that time, will they be allowed to complete or terminated?


Bård
________________________________________
From: Opm [opm-bounces at opm-project.org] on behalf of Arne Morten Kvarving [arne.morten.kvarving at sintef.no]
Sent: 27 June 2016 14:59
To: 'opm at opm-project.org'
Subject: [Opm] jenkins downtime

hi,

i will have to take jenkins down for a while at the end of the day
(1630-ish CET).

i need to build trilinos (for zoltan) and memory is exhausted with jobs
running in parallel.
hopefully the downtime won't last long.

arnem
_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
Opm at opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm


From arne.morten.kvarving at sintef.no  Mon Jun 27 13:14:06 2016
From: arne.morten.kvarving at sintef.no (Arne Morten Kvarving)
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 15:14:06 +0200
Subject: [Opm] jenkins downtime
In-Reply-To: <12B771AE701C544CB8C32192333A02CD015B7F4B64@SINTEFEXMBX04.sintef.no>
References: <5771232A.4030506@sintef.no>
 <12B771AE701C544CB8C32192333A02CD015B7F4B64@SINTEFEXMBX04.sintef.no>
Message-ID: <5771269E.5020109@sintef.no>

On 27. juni 2016 15:05, Bård Skaflestad wrote:
> Just out of curiosity: If there are any builds running at that time, will they be allowed to complete or terminated?
>
>
running jobs will be completed.

(sorry for the dupe bård, i forgot to reply to the list..)


From arne.morten.kvarving at sintef.no  Mon Jun 27 20:26:35 2016
From: arne.morten.kvarving at sintef.no (Arne Morten Kvarving)
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 22:26:35 +0200
Subject: [Opm] jenkins downtime
In-Reply-To: <5771269E.5020109@sintef.no>
References: <5771232A.4030506@sintef.no>
 <12B771AE701C544CB8C32192333A02CD015B7F4B64@SINTEFEXMBX04.sintef.no>
 <5771269E.5020109@sintef.no>
Message-ID: <57718BFB.2020107@sintef.no>

jenkins is back. all previously queued builds are now executing.

arnem