[Opm] Difference between WellState::perfRates and WellStateFullyImplicitBlackoil::perfPhaseRates

Andreas Lauser and at poware.org
Mon Sep 26 15:11:44 UTC 2016


On Monday, September 26, 2016 12:35:09 PM Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
> Quick tip on how to convert from surface rate to reservoir rate?

simple answer: forget about it ;)

complicated answer for the reservoir-to-surface rate of the oil component:

\sum i in well
r_i,o * B_o,i / rho_o,ref + r_i,g*B_g,i*R_v,i

where "r" is the reservoir rate, "B" the formation volume factor, R_v the oil 
vaporization factor and rho_o,ref the oil surface density. (note that you need 
the reservoir rates of the individual cells that penetrate the well, i.e., the 
sum of the well does not do the trick. also be aware that in the case of cross 
flow the sign of the reservoir rates for individual cells can be the opposite 
of sign of the summed up rate.)

cheers
  Andreas

> ________________________________
> From: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> on behalf of Atgeirr Rasmussen
> <Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 2:19:39 PM
> To: OPM Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Opm] Difference between WellState::perfRates and
> WellStateFullyImplicitBlackoil::perfPhaseRates
> 
> The perfRates() vector contains *reservoir volume* total rates at the
> perforations, while the perfPhaseRates() vector contain *surface volume*
> rates per phase. So it is not a direct sum.
> 
> Atgeirr
> 
> 
> 26. sep. 2016 kl. 14.10 skrev Jørgen Kvalsvik
> <JOKVA at statoil.com<mailto:JOKVA at statoil.com>>:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> What's the difference between these two vectors? Is perfRates just the sum
> of the pair/triples in perfPhaseRates?
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
> information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
> addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
> this message.
> Thank you
> _______________________________________________
> Opm mailing list
> Opm at opm-project.org<mailto:Opm at opm-project.org>
> http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
> information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
> addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
> this message.
> Thank you

-- 
Measuring programming progress by lines of code is like measuring aircraft
building progress by weight.
        -- Bill Gates
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20160926/1b69afe9/attachment.sig>


More information about the Opm mailing list