From andrescodas at br.ibm.com  Tue Aug  1 15:33:05 2017
From: andrescodas at br.ibm.com (Andres Codas Duarte)
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 15:33:05 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Help with installation
Message-ID: <mailman.0.1547015234.27952.opm@opm-project.org>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170801/ae07f0c3/attachment.html>

From joakim.hove at gmail.com  Tue Aug  1 20:28:52 2017
From: joakim.hove at gmail.com (Joakim Hove)
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 22:28:52 +0200
Subject: [Opm] Help with installation
In-Reply-To: <20170801153323.2652964E04@opm-web>
References: <20170801153323.2652964E04@opm-web>
Message-ID: <CALKD1M_7bLwAU=EYW68MGDqfrWrMyO01JOKzPe9_WsP_zJ6AtQ@mail.gmail.com>

You need the libecl library with Eclipse specific functionality. I would
*strongly* recommend to just use the master branch when building from
source.

1. Go to github.com/Statoil/libecl and build and install the libecl library.

2. Start with the master branch of opm-parser.

This should just work.

Joakim

1. aug. 2017 17:33 skrev "Andres Codas Duarte" <andrescodas at br.ibm.com>:

> Hi,
>
>   I'm trying to install opm-parser (release/2017.04) and get the following
> error at cmake configuration:
>
> -- Could NOT find ERT (missing: ERT_LIBRARY)
> CMake Error: The following variables are used in this project, but they
> are set to NOTFOUND.
> Please set them or make sure they are set and tested correctly in the
> CMake files:
> ERT_LIBRARY_ECLXX
>     linked by target "opmparser" in directory /Users/codas/opm/opm-parser/
> opm/parser/eclipse
>     linked by target "createDefaultKeywordList" in directory
> /Users/codas/opm/opm-parser/opm/parser/eclipse
> ERT_LIBRARY_ECL_WELL
>     linked by target "opmparser" in directory /Users/codas/opm/opm-parser/
> opm/parser/eclipse
>     linked by target "createDefaultKeywordList" in directory
> /Users/codas/opm/opm-parser/opm/parser/eclipse
> ERT_LIBRARY_GEOMETRY
>     linked by target "opmparser" in directory /Users/codas/opm/opm-parser/
> opm/parser/eclipse
>     linked by target "createDefaultKeywordList" in directory
> /Users/codas/opm/opm-parser/opm/parser/eclipse
> ERT_LIBRARY_UTIL
>     linked by target "opmparser" in directory /Users/codas/opm/opm-parser/
> opm/parser/eclipse
>     linked by target "createDefaultKeywordList" in directory
> /Users/codas/opm/opm-parser/opm/parser/eclipse
> ERT_LIBRARY_UTILXX
>     linked by target "opmparser" in directory /Users/codas/opm/opm-parser/
> opm/parser/eclipse
>     linked by target "createDefaultKeywordList" in directory
> /Users/codas/opm/opm-parser/opm/parser/eclipse
>
> libecl was installed successfully with default options, but overiding
> DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX.  The libraries associated with the errors above (e.g.
> ert_geometry)  are effectively not installed anywhere in my system  (I
> cannot find it with find / -name "*ert_geometry").
>
>    I appreciate your help.
>
>    Andres
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opm mailing list
> Opm at opm-project.org
> http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170801/460f7787/attachment.html>

From andrescodas at br.ibm.com  Tue Aug  1 21:23:56 2017
From: andrescodas at br.ibm.com (Andres Codas Duarte)
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 21:23:56 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Help with installation
In-Reply-To: <CALKD1M_7bLwAU=EYW68MGDqfrWrMyO01JOKzPe9_WsP_zJ6AtQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALKD1M_7bLwAU=EYW68MGDqfrWrMyO01JOKzPe9_WsP_zJ6AtQ@mail.gmail.com>,
 <20170801153323.2652964E04@opm-web>
Message-ID: <OFA969FE9D.F9F709CE-ON0025816F.00757F41-0025816F.00758C93@notes.na.collabserv.com>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170801/ec31d605/attachment.html>

From Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no  Wed Aug  2 07:22:59 2017
From: Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no (Atgeirr Rasmussen)
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 07:22:59 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Help with installation
In-Reply-To: <OFA969FE9D.F9F709CE-ON0025816F.00757F41-0025816F.00758C93@notes.na.collabserv.com>
References: <CALKD1M_7bLwAU=EYW68MGDqfrWrMyO01JOKzPe9_WsP_zJ6AtQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170801153323.2652964E04@opm-web>
 <OFA969FE9D.F9F709CE-ON0025816F.00757F41-0025816F.00758C93@notes.na.collabserv.com>
Message-ID: <58479D92-E991-4557-96A4-8F0FE0D31756@sintef.no>


Hello Andres!

I checked-out on 63b7cf6febf3f41e59b8803c06994e12a550c46a (which is earlier than the one above), and continued with a successful installation.

Good to hear!


I realized that you are pushing new commits every few hours to the master branch of all the opm-modules.  I guess these are not all properly unit-tested?  How should I proceed to compile a 'stable' executable?


Currently we only make stable releases every six months, as you know. In general, new commits are not accepted without testing. We use Jenkins at https://ci.opm-project.org to verify every pull request before it is merged, and as a rule patches are also reviewed before they are accepted. Inevitably, things go wrong once in a while, but the master branches are in a good state *almost* all the time.

Recently, some extra testing was performed on a particular version (more recent than the April release), and the repositories were tagged to make it easy to reproduce that version. If you check out the tag "testing/2017.06/rc1" across all repositories you should get that version, which is quite well tested.

If you want to stay current with ongoing development there is no way around using the master branches however.

Atgeirr

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170802/58b184d8/attachment.html>

From andrescodas at br.ibm.com  Wed Aug  2 14:32:24 2017
From: andrescodas at br.ibm.com (Andres Codas Duarte)
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 14:32:24 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Help with installation
In-Reply-To: <58479D92-E991-4557-96A4-8F0FE0D31756@sintef.no>
References: <58479D92-E991-4557-96A4-8F0FE0D31756@sintef.no>,
 <CALKD1M_7bLwAU=EYW68MGDqfrWrMyO01JOKzPe9_WsP_zJ6AtQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170801153323.2652964E04@opm-web>
 <OFA969FE9D.F9F709CE-ON0025816F.00757F41-0025816F.00758C93@notes.na.collabserv.com>
Message-ID: <OFE5202C70.57911420-ON00258170.004F1D2D-00258170.004FDF04@notes.na.collabserv.com>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170802/5a3b2ff1/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CMakeError.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 7710 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170802/5a3b2ff1/attachment.obj>

From abir at statoil.com  Wed Aug  2 15:42:49 2017
From: abir at statoil.com (Alf Birger Rustad)
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 15:42:49 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Help with installation
In-Reply-To: <OFE5202C70.57911420-ON00258170.004F1D2D-00258170.004FDF04@notes.na.collabserv.com>
References: <58479D92-E991-4557-96A4-8F0FE0D31756@sintef.no>,
 <CALKD1M_7bLwAU=EYW68MGDqfrWrMyO01JOKzPe9_WsP_zJ6AtQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170801153323.2652964E04@opm-web>
 <OFA969FE9D.F9F709CE-ON0025816F.00757F41-0025816F.00758C93@notes.na.collabserv.com>,
 <OFE5202C70.57911420-ON00258170.004F1D2D-00258170.004FDF04@notes.na.collabserv.com>
Message-ID: <DB6PR06MB3208FD7E142182C7882A233CD5B00@DB6PR06MB3208.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Andres,

Dune 2.4.1 was used with rc1, but 2.3.1 should also work fine. Any other version may be problematic. I am on vacation, so a bit limited abilities to help you. Still, what distribution are you building on?

Cheers,
Alf
________________________________
Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av Andres Codas Duarte <andrescodas at br.ibm.com>
Sendt: 2. august 2017 16:32:24
Kopi: opm at opm-project.org
Emne: Re: [Opm] Help with installation

Hi Atgeirr,

   Thank you!.

   What version of Dune should I use together with "testing/2017.06/rc1"?  I checkout on version 2.4 and I got the following error when building opm-core:

"
In file included from /Users/codas/opm/opm-core/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp/src.cxx:1:
In file included from /Users/codas/opm/opm-grid/dune/grid/CpGrid.hpp:62:
In file included from /Users/codas/opm/opm-grid/dune/grid/cpgrid/Intersection.hpp:52:
/Users/codas/opm/opm-grid/dune/grid/cpgrid/Geometry.hpp:48:10: fatal error: 'dune/geometry/genericgeometry/geometrytraits.hh' file not found
#include <dune/geometry/genericgeometry/geometrytraits.hh>
"

    The full CMakeError.log is attached

    I realized that there could be a misunderstanding in the version because the files for pkgconfig "dune-*.pc" say the version is "Version: 2.5.2-git" while I made sure to checkout on "releases/2.4" when installing.

     I'm confused, how do you recommend to proceed?.  I just want to install on a recent version from sources so I can debug the code.

     Thanks
     Andres

----- Original message -----
From: Atgeirr Rasmussen <Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no>
Sent by: "Opm" <opm-bounces at opm-project.org>
To: OPM Mailing List <opm at opm-project.org>
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Opm] Help with installation
Date: Wed, Aug 2, 2017 4:23 AM


Hello Andres!

I checked-out on 63b7cf6febf3f41e59b8803c06994e12a550c46a (which is earlier than the one above), and continued with a successful installation.

Good to hear!


I realized that you are pushing new commits every few hours to the master branch of all the opm-modules.  I guess these are not all properly unit-tested?  How should I proceed to compile a 'stable' executable?

Currently we only make stable releases every six months, as you know. In general, new commits are not accepted without testing. We use Jenkins at https://ci.opm-project.org to verify every pull request before it is merged, and as a rule patches are also reviewed before they are accepted. Inevitably, things go wrong once in a while, but the master branches are in a good state *almost* all the time.

Recently, some extra testing was performed on a particular version (more recent than the April release), and the repositories were tagged to make it easy to reproduce that version. If you check out the tag "testing/2017.06/rc1" across all repositories you should get that version, which is quite well tested.

If you want to stay current with ongoing development there is no way around using the master branches however.

Atgeirr

_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
Opm at opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm




-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170802/3b14bde6/attachment.html>

From andrescodas at br.ibm.com  Wed Aug  2 16:11:40 2017
From: andrescodas at br.ibm.com (Andres Codas Duarte)
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 16:11:40 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Help with installation
In-Reply-To: <DB6PR06MB3208FD7E142182C7882A233CD5B00@DB6PR06MB3208.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <DB6PR06MB3208FD7E142182C7882A233CD5B00@DB6PR06MB3208.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>,
 <58479D92-E991-4557-96A4-8F0FE0D31756@sintef.no>, 
 <CALKD1M_7bLwAU=EYW68MGDqfrWrMyO01JOKzPe9_WsP_zJ6AtQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170801153323.2652964E04@opm-web>
 <OFA969FE9D.F9F709CE-ON0025816F.00757F41-0025816F.00758C93@notes.na.collabserv.com>,
 <OFE5202C70.57911420-ON00258170.004F1D2D-00258170.004FDF04@notes.na.collabserv.com>
Message-ID: <OF724D3A79.3A698F66-ON00258170.005861ED-00258170.0058F57A@notes.na.collabserv.com>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170802/61212879/attachment.html>

From abir at statoil.com  Wed Aug  2 16:16:37 2017
From: abir at statoil.com (Alf Birger Rustad)
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 16:16:37 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Help with installation
In-Reply-To: <OF724D3A79.3A698F66-ON00258170.005861ED-00258170.0058F57A@notes.na.collabserv.com>
References: <DB6PR06MB3208FD7E142182C7882A233CD5B00@DB6PR06MB3208.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>,
 <58479D92-E991-4557-96A4-8F0FE0D31756@sintef.no>,
 <CALKD1M_7bLwAU=EYW68MGDqfrWrMyO01JOKzPe9_WsP_zJ6AtQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170801153323.2652964E04@opm-web>
 <OFA969FE9D.F9F709CE-ON0025816F.00757F41-0025816F.00758C93@notes.na.collabserv.com>,
 <OFE5202C70.57911420-ON00258170.004F1D2D-00258170.004FDF04@notes.na.collabserv.com>,
 <OF724D3A79.3A698F66-ON00258170.005861ED-00258170.0058F57A@notes.na.collabserv.com>
Message-ID: <DB6PR06MB320884E08C43BB4A0B48C3D2D5B00@DB6PR06MB3208.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

Then I am afraid I am not of much more help, I have no access to OSX. The most popular Linux distros have Dune packaged for you.

Cheers,
Alf

________________________________
Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av Andres Codas Duarte <andrescodas at br.ibm.com>
Sendt: 2. august 2017 18:11:40
Kopi: opm at opm-project.org
Emne: Re: [Opm] Help with installation

I'm on a MacOS Sierra (version 10.12.6).


----- Original message -----
From: Alf Birger Rustad <abir at statoil.com>
To: Andres Codas Duarte <andrescodas at br.ibm.com>
Cc: "opm at opm-project.org" <opm at opm-project.org>
Subject: SV: [Opm] Help with installation
Date: Wed, Aug 2, 2017 12:42 PM

Hi Andres,

Dune 2.4.1 was used with rc1, but 2.3.1 should also work fine. Any other version may be problematic. I am on vacation, so a bit limited abilities to help you. Still, what distribution are you building on?

Cheers,
Alf
________________________________
Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av Andres Codas Duarte <andrescodas at br.ibm.com>
Sendt: 2. august 2017 16:32:24
Kopi: opm at opm-project.org
Emne: Re: [Opm] Help with installation

Hi Atgeirr,

   Thank you!.

   What version of Dune should I use together with "testing/2017.06/rc1"?  I checkout on version 2.4 and I got the following error when building opm-core:

"
In file included from /Users/codas/opm/opm-core/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp/src.cxx:1:
In file included from /Users/codas/opm/opm-grid/dune/grid/CpGrid.hpp:62:
In file included from /Users/codas/opm/opm-grid/dune/grid/cpgrid/Intersection.hpp:52:
/Users/codas/opm/opm-grid/dune/grid/cpgrid/Geometry.hpp:48:10: fatal error: 'dune/geometry/genericgeometry/geometrytraits.hh' file not found
#include <dune/geometry/genericgeometry/geometrytraits.hh>
"

    The full CMakeError.log is attached

    I realized that there could be a misunderstanding in the version because the files for pkgconfig "dune-*.pc" say the version is "Version: 2.5.2-git" while I made sure to checkout on "releases/2.4" when installing.

     I'm confused, how do you recommend to proceed?.  I just want to install on a recent version from sources so I can debug the code.

     Thanks
     Andres

----- Original message -----
From: Atgeirr Rasmussen <Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no>
Sent by: "Opm" <opm-bounces at opm-project.org>
To: OPM Mailing List <opm at opm-project.org>
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Opm] Help with installation
Date: Wed, Aug 2, 2017 4:23 AM


Hello Andres!

I checked-out on 63b7cf6febf3f41e59b8803c06994e12a550c46a (which is earlier than the one above), and continued with a successful installation.

Good to hear!


I realized that you are pushing new commits every few hours to the master branch of all the opm-modules.  I guess these are not all properly unit-tested?  How should I proceed to compile a 'stable' executable?

Currently we only make stable releases every six months, as you know. In general, new commits are not accepted without testing. We use Jenkins at https://ci.opm-project.org to verify every pull request before it is merged, and as a rule patches are also reviewed before they are accepted. Inevitably, things go wrong once in a while, but the master branches are in a good state *almost* all the time.

Recently, some extra testing was performed on a particular version (more recent than the April release), and the repositories were tagged to make it easy to reproduce that version. If you check out the tag "testing/2017.06/rc1" across all repositories you should get that version, which is quite well tested.

If you want to stay current with ongoing development there is no way around using the master branches however.

Atgeirr

_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
Opm at opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm



-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you




-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170802/d73d1228/attachment.html>

From andrescodas at br.ibm.com  Wed Aug  2 16:27:09 2017
From: andrescodas at br.ibm.com (Andres Codas Duarte)
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 16:27:09 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Help with installation
In-Reply-To: <DB6PR06MB320884E08C43BB4A0B48C3D2D5B00@DB6PR06MB3208.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <DB6PR06MB320884E08C43BB4A0B48C3D2D5B00@DB6PR06MB3208.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>,
 <DB6PR06MB3208FD7E142182C7882A233CD5B00@DB6PR06MB3208.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>,
 <58479D92-E991-4557-96A4-8F0FE0D31756@sintef.no>,
 <CALKD1M_7bLwAU=EYW68MGDqfrWrMyO01JOKzPe9_WsP_zJ6AtQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170801153323.2652964E04@opm-web>
 <OFA969FE9D.F9F709CE-ON0025816F.00757F41-0025816F.00758C93@notes.na.collabserv.com>,
 <OFE5202C70.57911420-ON00258170.004F1D2D-00258170.004FDF04@notes.na.collabserv.com>,
 <OF724D3A79.3A698F66-ON00258170.005861ED-00258170.0058F57A@notes.na.collabserv.com>
Message-ID: <OFE187A7E1.2085FFCA-ON00258170.0059EAA1-00258170.005A607F@notes.na.collabserv.com>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170802/1e6a46fe/attachment.html>

From abir at statoil.com  Wed Aug  2 17:07:10 2017
From: abir at statoil.com (Alf Birger Rustad)
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 17:07:10 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Help with installation
In-Reply-To: <OFE187A7E1.2085FFCA-ON00258170.0059EAA1-00258170.005A607F@notes.na.collabserv.com>
References: <DB6PR06MB320884E08C43BB4A0B48C3D2D5B00@DB6PR06MB3208.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>,
 <DB6PR06MB3208FD7E142182C7882A233CD5B00@DB6PR06MB3208.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>,
 <58479D92-E991-4557-96A4-8F0FE0D31756@sintef.no>,
 <CALKD1M_7bLwAU=EYW68MGDqfrWrMyO01JOKzPe9_WsP_zJ6AtQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170801153323.2652964E04@opm-web>
 <OFA969FE9D.F9F709CE-ON0025816F.00757F41-0025816F.00758C93@notes.na.collabserv.com>,
 <OFE5202C70.57911420-ON00258170.004F1D2D-00258170.004FDF04@notes.na.collabserv.com>,
 <OF724D3A79.3A698F66-ON00258170.005861ED-00258170.0058F57A@notes.na.collabserv.com>,
 <OFE187A7E1.2085FFCA-ON00258170.0059EAA1-00258170.005A607F@notes.na.collabserv.com>
Message-ID: <DB6PR06MB3208126696E3D035E4D6000DD5B00@DB6PR06MB3208.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

I am a bit blindfolded I am afraid, but it looks similar to the issues we have had with Boost lately.

Cheers,
Alf

________________________________
Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av Andres Codas Duarte <andrescodas at br.ibm.com>
Sendt: 2. august 2017 18:27:09
Kopi: opm at opm-project.org
Emne: Re: [Opm] Help with installation

Dear Alf,

   Dune seems to be compiling correctly.  I'm having issues when executing cmake for opm-core, with the following output (I sent the corresponding CMakeErrog.log before):

CMake Error at /usr/local/Cellar/cmake/3.9.0/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:137 (message):
  Could NOT find opm-grid (missing: HAVE_OPM_GRID)
Call Stack (most recent call first):
  /usr/local/Cellar/cmake/3.9.0/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:377 (_FPHSA_FAILURE_MESSAGE)
  /Users/codas/local/share/opm/cmake/Modules/OpmPackage.cmake:368 (find_package_handle_standard_args)
  /Users/codas/local/share/opm/cmake/Modules/Findopm-grid.cmake:15 (find_opm_package)
  /Users/codas/local/share/opm/cmake/Modules/OpmFind.cmake:147 (find_package)
  /Users/codas/local/share/opm/cmake/Modules/OpmFind.cmake:211 (find_and_append_package_to)
  /Users/codas/local/share/opm/cmake/Modules/OpmLibMain.cmake:116 (find_and_append_package_list_to)
  CMakeLists.txt:158 (include)

-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!

    Note that opm-grid was previously successfully installed.

    Are you suggesting that the error is on Dune?

    Andres

----- Original message -----
From: Alf Birger Rustad <abir at statoil.com>
To: Andres Codas Duarte <andrescodas at br.ibm.com>
Cc: "opm at opm-project.org" <opm at opm-project.org>
Subject: SV: [Opm] Help with installation
Date: Wed, Aug 2, 2017 1:17 PM

Then I am afraid I am not of much more help, I have no access to OSX. The most popular Linux distros have Dune packaged for you.

Cheers,
Alf

________________________________
Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av Andres Codas Duarte <andrescodas at br.ibm.com>
Sendt: 2. august 2017 18:11:40
Kopi: opm at opm-project.org
Emne: Re: [Opm] Help with installation

I'm on a MacOS Sierra (version 10.12.6).


----- Original message -----
From: Alf Birger Rustad <abir at statoil.com>
To: Andres Codas Duarte <andrescodas at br.ibm.com>
Cc: "opm at opm-project.org" <opm at opm-project.org>
Subject: SV: [Opm] Help with installation
Date: Wed, Aug 2, 2017 12:42 PM

Hi Andres,

Dune 2.4.1 was used with rc1, but 2.3.1 should also work fine. Any other version may be problematic. I am on vacation, so a bit limited abilities to help you. Still, what distribution are you building on?

Cheers,
Alf
________________________________
Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av Andres Codas Duarte <andrescodas at br.ibm.com>
Sendt: 2. august 2017 16:32:24
Kopi: opm at opm-project.org
Emne: Re: [Opm] Help with installation

Hi Atgeirr,

   Thank you!.

   What version of Dune should I use together with "testing/2017.06/rc1"?  I checkout on version 2.4 and I got the following error when building opm-core:

"
In file included from /Users/codas/opm/opm-core/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp/src.cxx:1:
In file included from /Users/codas/opm/opm-grid/dune/grid/CpGrid.hpp:62:
In file included from /Users/codas/opm/opm-grid/dune/grid/cpgrid/Intersection.hpp:52:
/Users/codas/opm/opm-grid/dune/grid/cpgrid/Geometry.hpp:48:10: fatal error: 'dune/geometry/genericgeometry/geometrytraits.hh' file not found
#include <dune/geometry/genericgeometry/geometrytraits.hh>
"

    The full CMakeError.log is attached

    I realized that there could be a misunderstanding in the version because the files for pkgconfig "dune-*.pc" say the version is "Version: 2.5.2-git" while I made sure to checkout on "releases/2.4" when installing.

     I'm confused, how do you recommend to proceed?.  I just want to install on a recent version from sources so I can debug the code.

     Thanks
     Andres

----- Original message -----
From: Atgeirr Rasmussen <Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no>
Sent by: "Opm" <opm-bounces at opm-project.org>
To: OPM Mailing List <opm at opm-project.org>
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Opm] Help with installation
Date: Wed, Aug 2, 2017 4:23 AM


Hello Andres!

I checked-out on 63b7cf6febf3f41e59b8803c06994e12a550c46a (which is earlier than the one above), and continued with a successful installation.

Good to hear!


I realized that you are pushing new commits every few hours to the master branch of all the opm-modules.  I guess these are not all properly unit-tested?  How should I proceed to compile a 'stable' executable?

Currently we only make stable releases every six months, as you know. In general, new commits are not accepted without testing. We use Jenkins at https://ci.opm-project.org to verify every pull request before it is merged, and as a rule patches are also reviewed before they are accepted. Inevitably, things go wrong once in a while, but the master branches are in a good state *almost* all the time.

Recently, some extra testing was performed on a particular version (more recent than the April release), and the repositories were tagged to make it easy to reproduce that version. If you check out the tag "testing/2017.06/rc1" across all repositories you should get that version, which is quite well tested.

If you want to stay current with ongoing development there is no way around using the master branches however.

Atgeirr

_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
Opm at opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm



-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you



-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you




-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170802/21ac0405/attachment.html>

From andrescodas at br.ibm.com  Wed Aug  2 21:07:28 2017
From: andrescodas at br.ibm.com (Andres Codas Duarte)
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 21:07:28 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Help with installation
In-Reply-To: <DB6PR06MB3208126696E3D035E4D6000DD5B00@DB6PR06MB3208.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <DB6PR06MB3208126696E3D035E4D6000DD5B00@DB6PR06MB3208.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>,
 <DB6PR06MB320884E08C43BB4A0B48C3D2D5B00@DB6PR06MB3208.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>,
 <DB6PR06MB3208FD7E142182C7882A233CD5B00@DB6PR06MB3208.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>,
 <58479D92-E991-4557-96A4-8F0FE0D31756@sintef.no>,
 <CALKD1M_7bLwAU=EYW68MGDqfrWrMyO01JOKzPe9_WsP_zJ6AtQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170801153323.2652964E04@opm-web>
 <OFA969FE9D.F9F709CE-ON0025816F.00757F41-0025816F.00758C93@notes.na.collabserv.com>,
 <OFE5202C70.57911420-ON00258170.004F1D2D-00258170.004FDF04@notes.na.collabserv.com>,
 <OF724D3A79.3A698F66-ON00258170.005861ED-00258170.0058F57A@notes.na.collabserv.com>,
 <OFE187A7E1.2085FFCA-ON00258170.0059EAA1-00258170.005A607F@notes.na.collabserv.com>
Message-ID: <OFDA9310A3.32FB09D4-ON00258170.0073BB86-00258170.00740A89@notes.na.collabserv.com>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170802/52c5d46f/attachment.html>

From abir at statoil.com  Wed Aug  2 21:31:27 2017
From: abir at statoil.com (Alf Birger Rustad)
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 21:31:27 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Help with installation
In-Reply-To: <OFDA9310A3.32FB09D4-ON00258170.0073BB86-00258170.00740A89@notes.na.collabserv.com>
References: <DB6PR06MB3208126696E3D035E4D6000DD5B00@DB6PR06MB3208.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>,
 <DB6PR06MB320884E08C43BB4A0B48C3D2D5B00@DB6PR06MB3208.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>,
 <DB6PR06MB3208FD7E142182C7882A233CD5B00@DB6PR06MB3208.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>,
 <58479D92-E991-4557-96A4-8F0FE0D31756@sintef.no>,
 <CALKD1M_7bLwAU=EYW68MGDqfrWrMyO01JOKzPe9_WsP_zJ6AtQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170801153323.2652964E04@opm-web>
 <OFA969FE9D.F9F709CE-ON0025816F.00757F41-0025816F.00758C93@notes.na.collabserv.com>,
 <OFE5202C70.57911420-ON00258170.004F1D2D-00258170.004FDF04@notes.na.collabserv.com>,
 <OF724D3A79.3A698F66-ON00258170.005861ED-00258170.0058F57A@notes.na.collabserv.com>,
 <OFE187A7E1.2085FFCA-ON00258170.0059EAA1-00258170.005A607F@notes.na.collabserv.com>,
 <OFDA9310A3.32FB09D4-ON00258170.0073BB86-00258170.00740A89@notes.na.collabserv.com>
Message-ID: <HE1PR06MB3209E8CD7638C3F86AD986BED5B00@HE1PR06MB3209.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

Great :-) Please note that SPE1CASE1 is still not supported due to missing DRSDT support. SPE1CASE2 on the other hand runs perfectly with flow.

Enjoy!
Alf

________________________________
Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av Andres Codas Duarte <andrescodas at br.ibm.com>
Sendt: 2. august 2017 23:07:28
Til: opm at opm-project.org
Emne: Re: [Opm] Help with installation

Hi,

  I finally managed to install flow and successfully tested it with SPE1CASE1.DATA . Thank you very much for your help. The main issue was with Dune, as my git repository was broken for some unknown reason. I cloned it again and then worked.

  I followed the instructions from opm-project.org/?page_id=231 with some exceptions that I would like to share with you

-- In the pre-requisites
- I used DUNEVERSION=2.4 and set CMAKE_FLAGS="-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX='~/local/'" in the installing script for Dune.
- I set PKG_CONFIG_PATH with export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=$PKG_CONFIG_PATH:$HOME/local/lib/pkgconfig/
- I ran ./dune-common/bin/dunecontrol make install all
- For SuperLU I followed the instructions from https://www.dune-project.org/doc/install-superlu/ and installed version 4.3. I set the environment variable SUPERLU_ROOT to specify the installation location. Observe that the latest SuperLu is not supported, and the instructions you provide to install SuperLu with brew do not work

-- For each OPM module
- I checked out on "testing/2017.06/rc1" except for opm-upscaling which doesn't have this tag.  I did not install opm-upscaling.
- I configured with cmake .. -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=~/local/ -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug in sub-directory called build

   Cheers!
   Andres

________________________________
Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av Andres Codas Duarte <andrescodas at br.ibm.com>
Sendt: 2. august 2017 18:27:09
Kopi: opm at opm-project.org
Emne: Re: [Opm] Help with installation

Dear Alf,

   Dune seems to be compiling correctly.  I'm having issues when executing cmake for opm-core, with the following output (I sent the corresponding CMakeErrog.log before):

CMake Error at /usr/local/Cellar/cmake/3.9.0/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:137 (message):
  Could NOT find opm-grid (missing: HAVE_OPM_GRID)
Call Stack (most recent call first):
  /usr/local/Cellar/cmake/3.9.0/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:377 (_FPHSA_FAILURE_MESSAGE)
  /Users/codas/local/share/opm/cmake/Modules/OpmPackage.cmake:368 (find_package_handle_standard_args)
  /Users/codas/local/share/opm/cmake/Modules/Findopm-grid.cmake:15 (find_opm_package)
  /Users/codas/local/share/opm/cmake/Modules/OpmFind.cmake:147 (find_package)
  /Users/codas/local/share/opm/cmake/Modules/OpmFind.cmake:211 (find_and_append_package_to)
  /Users/codas/local/share/opm/cmake/Modules/OpmLibMain.cmake:116 (find_and_append_package_list_to)
  CMakeLists.txt:158 (include)

-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!

    Note that opm-grid was previously successfully installed.

    Are you suggesting that the error is on Dune?

    Andres

----- Original message -----
From: Alf Birger Rustad <abir at statoil.com>
To: Andres Codas Duarte <andrescodas at br.ibm.com>
Cc: "opm at opm-project.org" <opm at opm-project.org>
Subject: SV: [Opm] Help with installation
Date: Wed, Aug 2, 2017 1:17 PM

Then I am afraid I am not of much more help, I have no access to OSX. The most popular Linux distros have Dune packaged for you.

Cheers,
Alf

________________________________
Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av Andres Codas Duarte <andrescodas at br.ibm.com>
Sendt: 2. august 2017 18:11:40
Kopi: opm at opm-project.org
Emne: Re: [Opm] Help with installation

I'm on a MacOS Sierra (version 10.12.6).


----- Original message -----
From: Alf Birger Rustad <abir at statoil.com>
To: Andres Codas Duarte <andrescodas at br.ibm.com>
Cc: "opm at opm-project.org" <opm at opm-project.org>
Subject: SV: [Opm] Help with installation
Date: Wed, Aug 2, 2017 12:42 PM

Hi Andres,

Dune 2.4.1 was used with rc1, but 2.3.1 should also work fine. Any other version may be problematic. I am on vacation, so a bit limited abilities to help you. Still, what distribution are you building on?

Cheers,
Alf
________________________________
Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av Andres Codas Duarte <andrescodas at br.ibm.com>
Sendt: 2. august 2017 16:32:24
Kopi: opm at opm-project.org
Emne: Re: [Opm] Help with installation

Hi Atgeirr,

   Thank you!.

   What version of Dune should I use together with "testing/2017.06/rc1"?  I checkout on version 2.4 and I got the following error when building opm-core:

"
In file included from /Users/codas/opm/opm-core/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp/src.cxx:1:
In file included from /Users/codas/opm/opm-grid/dune/grid/CpGrid.hpp:62:
In file included from /Users/codas/opm/opm-grid/dune/grid/cpgrid/Intersection.hpp:52:
/Users/codas/opm/opm-grid/dune/grid/cpgrid/Geometry.hpp:48:10: fatal error: 'dune/geometry/genericgeometry/geometrytraits.hh' file not found
#include <dune/geometry/genericgeometry/geometrytraits.hh>
"

    The full CMakeError.log is attached

    I realized that there could be a misunderstanding in the version because the files for pkgconfig "dune-*.pc" say the version is "Version: 2.5.2-git" while I made sure to checkout on "releases/2.4" when installing.

     I'm confused, how do you recommend to proceed?.  I just want to install on a recent version from sources so I can debug the code.

     Thanks
     Andres

----- Original message -----
From: Atgeirr Rasmussen <Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no>
Sent by: "Opm" <opm-bounces at opm-project.org>
To: OPM Mailing List <opm at opm-project.org>
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Opm] Help with installation
Date: Wed, Aug 2, 2017 4:23 AM


Hello Andres!

I checked-out on 63b7cf6febf3f41e59b8803c06994e12a550c46a (which is earlier than the one above), and continued with a successful installation.

Good to hear!


I realized that you are pushing new commits every few hours to the master branch of all the opm-modules.  I guess these are not all properly unit-tested?  How should I proceed to compile a 'stable' executable?

Currently we only make stable releases every six months, as you know. In general, new commits are not accepted without testing. We use Jenkins at https://ci.opm-project.org to verify every pull request before it is merged, and as a rule patches are also reviewed before they are accepted. Inevitably, things go wrong once in a while, but the master branches are in a good state *almost* all the time.

Recently, some extra testing was performed on a particular version (more recent than the April release), and the repositories were tagged to make it easy to reproduce that version. If you check out the tag "testing/2017.06/rc1" across all repositories you should get that version, which is quite well tested.

If you want to stay current with ongoing development there is no way around using the master branches however.

Atgeirr

_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
Opm at opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm



-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you



-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you



-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you




-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170802/93b74a9b/attachment.html>

From Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no  Thu Aug  3 06:59:08 2017
From: Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no (Atgeirr Rasmussen)
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 06:59:08 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Help with installation
In-Reply-To: <OFDA9310A3.32FB09D4-ON00258170.0073BB86-00258170.00740A89@notes.na.collabserv.com>
References: <DB6PR06MB3208126696E3D035E4D6000DD5B00@DB6PR06MB3208.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <DB6PR06MB320884E08C43BB4A0B48C3D2D5B00@DB6PR06MB3208.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <DB6PR06MB3208FD7E142182C7882A233CD5B00@DB6PR06MB3208.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <58479D92-E991-4557-96A4-8F0FE0D31756@sintef.no>
 <CALKD1M_7bLwAU=EYW68MGDqfrWrMyO01JOKzPe9_WsP_zJ6AtQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170801153323.2652964E04@opm-web>
 <OFA969FE9D.F9F709CE-ON0025816F.00757F41-0025816F.00758C93@notes.na.collabserv.com>
 <OFE5202C70.57911420-ON00258170.004F1D2D-00258170.004FDF04@notes.na.collabserv.com>
 <OF724D3A79.3A698F66-ON00258170.005861ED-00258170.0058F57A@notes.na.collabserv.com>
 <OFE187A7E1.2085FFCA-ON00258170.0059EAA1-00258170.005A607F@notes.na.collabserv.com>
 <OFDA9310A3.32FB09D4-ON00258170.0073BB86-00258170.00740A89@notes.na.collabserv.com>
Message-ID: <8B8CC7E1-57C9-4811-8C6E-FDA8B050BED1@sintef.no>

Hi,

Thank you for persevering, and sharing your experience so that we can improve our instructions!


2. aug. 2017 kl. 23.07 skrev Andres Codas Duarte <andrescodas at br.ibm.com<mailto:andrescodas at br.ibm.com>>:

Hi,

  I finally managed to install flow and successfully tested it with SPE1CASE1.DATA . Thank you very much for your help. The main issue was with Dune, as my git repository was broken for some unknown reason. I cloned it again and then worked.

  I followed the instructions from opm-project.org/?page_id=231<http://opm-project.org/?page_id=231> with some exceptions that I would like to share with you

-- In the pre-requisites
- I used DUNEVERSION=2.4 and set CMAKE_FLAGS="-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX='~/local/'" in the installing script for Dune.
- I set PKG_CONFIG_PATH with export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=$PKG_CONFIG_PATH:$HOME/local/lib/pkgconfig/
- I ran ./dune-common/bin/dunecontrol make install all
- For SuperLU I followed the instructions from https://www.dune-project.org/doc/install-superlu/ and installed version 4.3. I set the environment variable SUPERLU_ROOT to specify the installation location. Observe that the latest SuperLu is not supported, and the instructions you provide to install SuperLu with brew do not work

I have updated the prerequisites page http://opm-project.org/?page_id=239 to set the recommended Dune version to 2.4, and warn about SuperLU. In the end I found it easiest to just provide a link to the Dune SuperLU page for that. I did not change the options for installing to a local dir as you have done, though.


-- For each OPM module
- I checked out on "testing/2017.06/rc1" except for opm-upscaling which doesn't have this tag.  I did not install opm-upscaling.
- I configured with cmake .. -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=~/local/ -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug in sub-directory called build


I think that the latest master of opm-upscaling should work fine with the testing/2017.06/rc1 versions of the other modules, if you are interested.



Atgeirr

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170803/7256e8c9/attachment.html>

From joaho at statoil.com  Sun Aug  6 19:57:52 2017
From: joaho at statoil.com (Joakim Hove)
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 19:57:52 +0000
Subject: [Opm] New version of libecl soon required.
Message-ID: <AM5PR06MB30743A2B598C8DD049055D88AEB40@AM5PR06MB3074.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

See the PR message here: https://github.com/OPM/opm-parser/pull/1112



Joakim


-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170806/ff1da05b/attachment.html>

From kangqiaohu at gmail.com  Mon Aug  7 17:45:19 2017
From: kangqiaohu at gmail.com (Kangqiao Hu)
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 13:45:19 -0400
Subject: [Opm] Parallel OPM flow simulation
Message-ID: <77C6103B-B09F-454B-B651-39FF5A1F598C@gmail.com>

Hi Everyone,

 

I am new to OPM and just had a successful build from source codes on Mac. I was trying to run SPE10 model2 with flow_legacy, and I found that it only utilized one core. I was wondering if there is a parallel option that I can make use all of the available cores? Thanks.

 

Regards

Kang

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170807/83aa9706/attachment.html>

From abir at statoil.com  Mon Aug  7 20:00:12 2017
From: abir at statoil.com (Alf Birger Rustad)
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 20:00:12 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Parallel OPM flow simulation
In-Reply-To: <77C6103B-B09F-454B-B651-39FF5A1F598C@gmail.com>
References: <77C6103B-B09F-454B-B651-39FF5A1F598C@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <HE1PR06MB32098915F8F8BF06C769A133D5B50@HE1PR06MB3209.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Kang,

On OSX I am afraid you are on your own when it comes to MPI. On supported Linux distributions we have MPI enabled binaries packaged, and it is invoked in the standard way with mpirun.

Cheers,
Alf

________________________________
Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av Kangqiao Hu <kangqiaohu at gmail.com>
Sendt: 7. august 2017 19:45:19
Til: Opm at opm-project.org
Emne: [Opm] Parallel OPM flow simulation

Hi Everyone,

I am new to OPM and just had a successful build from source codes on Mac. I was trying to run SPE10 model2 with flow_legacy, and I found that it only utilized one core. I was wondering if there is a parallel option that I can make use all of the available cores? Thanks.

Regards
Kang


-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170807/1469a76e/attachment.html>

From kangqiaohu at gmail.com  Mon Aug  7 20:42:14 2017
From: kangqiaohu at gmail.com (Kangqiao Hu)
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 16:42:14 -0400
Subject: [Opm] Parallel OPM flow simulation
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR06MB32098915F8F8BF06C769A133D5B50@HE1PR06MB3209.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <77C6103B-B09F-454B-B651-39FF5A1F598C@gmail.com>
 <HE1PR06MB32098915F8F8BF06C769A133D5B50@HE1PR06MB3209.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <6FA19252-4073-40DB-A3E3-871C3B4137F3@gmail.com>

Thanks Alf for quick reply. Let me try the same in OSX. Thanks.

 

Regards

Kang

 

From: Alf Birger Rustad <abir at statoil.com>
Date: Monday, August 7, 2017 at 4:00 PM
To: Kangqiao Hu <kangqiaohu at gmail.com>, "Opm at opm-project.org" <Opm at opm-project.org>
Subject: SV: Parallel OPM flow simulation

 

Hi Kang,

On OSX I am afraid you are on your own when it comes to MPI. On supported Linux distributions we have MPI enabled binaries packaged, and it is invoked in the standard way with mpirun.

Cheers,
Alf

Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av Kangqiao Hu <kangqiaohu at gmail.com>
Sendt: 7. august 2017 19:45:19
Til: Opm at opm-project.org
Emne: [Opm] Parallel OPM flow simulation 

 

Hi Everyone,

 

I am new to OPM and just had a successful build from source codes on Mac. I was trying to run SPE10 model2 with flow_legacy, and I found that it only utilized one core. I was wondering if there is a parallel option that I can make use all of the available cores? Thanks.

 

Regards

Kang



-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170807/ed630729/attachment.html>

From abir at statoil.com  Mon Aug  7 21:00:03 2017
From: abir at statoil.com (Alf Birger Rustad)
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 21:00:03 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Parallel OPM flow simulation
In-Reply-To: <6FA19252-4073-40DB-A3E3-871C3B4137F3@gmail.com>
References: <77C6103B-B09F-454B-B651-39FF5A1F598C@gmail.com>
 <HE1PR06MB32098915F8F8BF06C769A133D5B50@HE1PR06MB3209.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>,
 <6FA19252-4073-40DB-A3E3-871C3B4137F3@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <HE1PR06MB3209A708A336013DABED29CDD5B50@HE1PR06MB3209.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

Hi again,

My apologies, I was unaware of Apple's renaming. OSX will probably give you the exact same challenges as the current macOS. Basically we do not support MPI on Macs. We are still working on simplifying the compilation of MPI binaries on Linux, so it may be a rocky ride to try it on a Mac.

Sorry,
Alf
________________________________
Fra: Kangqiao Hu <kangqiaohu at gmail.com>
Sendt: 7. august 2017 22:42:14
Til: Alf Birger Rustad; Opm at opm-project.org
Emne: Re: Parallel OPM flow simulation

Thanks Alf for quick reply. Let me try the same in OSX. Thanks.

Regards
Kang

From: Alf Birger Rustad <abir at statoil.com>
Date: Monday, August 7, 2017 at 4:00 PM
To: Kangqiao Hu <kangqiaohu at gmail.com>, "Opm at opm-project.org" <Opm at opm-project.org>
Subject: SV: Parallel OPM flow simulation

Hi Kang,

On OSX I am afraid you are on your own when it comes to MPI. On supported Linux distributions we have MPI enabled binaries packaged, and it is invoked in the standard way with mpirun.

Cheers,
Alf
________________________________
Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av Kangqiao Hu <kangqiaohu at gmail.com>
Sendt: 7. august 2017 19:45:19
Til: Opm at opm-project.org
Emne: [Opm] Parallel OPM flow simulation

Hi Everyone,

I am new to OPM and just had a successful build from source codes on Mac. I was trying to run SPE10 model2 with flow_legacy, and I found that it only utilized one core. I was wondering if there is a parallel option that I can make use all of the available cores? Thanks.

Regards
Kang


-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you



-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170807/f6619d98/attachment.html>

From kangqiaohu at gmail.com  Mon Aug  7 21:06:37 2017
From: kangqiaohu at gmail.com (Kangqiao Hu)
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 17:06:37 -0400
Subject: [Opm] Parallel OPM flow simulation
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR06MB3209A708A336013DABED29CDD5B50@HE1PR06MB3209.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <77C6103B-B09F-454B-B651-39FF5A1F598C@gmail.com>
 <HE1PR06MB32098915F8F8BF06C769A133D5B50@HE1PR06MB3209.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <6FA19252-4073-40DB-A3E3-871C3B4137F3@gmail.com>
 <HE1PR06MB3209A708A336013DABED29CDD5B50@HE1PR06MB3209.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <42D01E35-DE14-438E-8035-FF5D6D967C30@gmail.com>

Hi Alf,

 

Thanks for clarifying. Then I might simply give up multi-thread on macOS for the moment.

 

Regards

Kang

 

From: Alf Birger Rustad <abir at statoil.com>
Date: Monday, August 7, 2017 at 5:00 PM
To: Kangqiao Hu <kangqiaohu at gmail.com>, "Opm at opm-project.org" <Opm at opm-project.org>
Subject: SV: Parallel OPM flow simulation

 

Hi again,

My apologies, I was unaware of Apple's renaming. OSX will probably give you the exact same challenges as the current macOS. Basically we do not support MPI on Macs. We are still working on simplifying the compilation of MPI binaries on Linux, so it may be a rocky ride to try it on a Mac.

Sorry,
Alf

Fra: Kangqiao Hu <kangqiaohu at gmail.com>
Sendt: 7. august 2017 22:42:14
Til: Alf Birger Rustad; Opm at opm-project.org
Emne: Re: Parallel OPM flow simulation 

 

Thanks Alf for quick reply. Let me try the same in OSX. Thanks.

 

Regards

Kang

 

From: Alf Birger Rustad <abir at statoil.com>
Date: Monday, August 7, 2017 at 4:00 PM
To: Kangqiao Hu <kangqiaohu at gmail.com>, "Opm at opm-project.org" <Opm at opm-project.org>
Subject: SV: Parallel OPM flow simulation

 

Hi Kang,

On OSX I am afraid you are on your own when it comes to MPI. On supported Linux distributions we have MPI enabled binaries packaged, and it is invoked in the standard way with mpirun.

Cheers,
Alf

Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av Kangqiao Hu <kangqiaohu at gmail.com>
Sendt: 7. august 2017 19:45:19
Til: Opm at opm-project.org
Emne: [Opm] Parallel OPM flow simulation 

 

Hi Everyone,

 

I am new to OPM and just had a successful build from source codes on Mac. I was trying to run SPE10 model2 with flow_legacy, and I found that it only utilized one core. I was wondering if there is a parallel option that I can make use all of the available cores? Thanks.

 

Regards

Kang



-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you





-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170807/ac579b5e/attachment.html>

From Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no  Tue Aug  8 07:49:58 2017
From: Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no (Atgeirr Rasmussen)
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 07:49:58 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Parallel OPM flow simulation
In-Reply-To: <42D01E35-DE14-438E-8035-FF5D6D967C30@gmail.com>
References: <77C6103B-B09F-454B-B651-39FF5A1F598C@gmail.com>
 <HE1PR06MB32098915F8F8BF06C769A133D5B50@HE1PR06MB3209.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <6FA19252-4073-40DB-A3E3-871C3B4137F3@gmail.com>
 <HE1PR06MB3209A708A336013DABED29CDD5B50@HE1PR06MB3209.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <42D01E35-DE14-438E-8035-FF5D6D967C30@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4A954AE9-F88C-46F1-89FC-D591D9605221@sintef.no>

Dear Kang,

If you follow the instructions for Mac OS X on this page:

http://opm-project.org/?page_id=239

you should be able to build with MPI, although it has not been tested with the latest version of macOS. However, you will then only get a very basic partitioning scheme. To get a good partitioning, which is necessary for reasonable parallel performance, you must also install the Zoltan library, and we have struggled a bit with that, also on Linux in fact (it is not trivial to get right)! To help with this, on Ubuntu we do provide binary packages for this library in the OPM ppa. The easiest way to experiment with MPI and Flow right now is therefore to use an Ubuntu VM.

Atgeirr


7. aug. 2017 kl. 23.06 skrev Kangqiao Hu <kangqiaohu at gmail.com<mailto:kangqiaohu at gmail.com>>:

Hi Alf,

Thanks for clarifying. Then I might simply give up multi-thread on macOS for the moment.

Regards
Kang

From: Alf Birger Rustad <abir at statoil.com<mailto:abir at statoil.com>>
Date: Monday, August 7, 2017 at 5:00 PM
To: Kangqiao Hu <kangqiaohu at gmail.com<mailto:kangqiaohu at gmail.com>>, "Opm at opm-project.org<mailto:Opm at opm-project.org>" <Opm at opm-project.org<mailto:Opm at opm-project.org>>
Subject: SV: Parallel OPM flow simulation

Hi again,

My apologies, I was unaware of Apple's renaming. OSX will probably give you the exact same challenges as the current macOS. Basically we do not support MPI on Macs. We are still working on simplifying the compilation of MPI binaries on Linux, so it may be a rocky ride to try it on a Mac.

Sorry,
Alf
________________________________
Fra: Kangqiao Hu <kangqiaohu at gmail.com<mailto:kangqiaohu at gmail.com>>
Sendt: 7. august 2017 22:42:14
Til: Alf Birger Rustad; Opm at opm-project.org<mailto:Opm at opm-project.org>
Emne: Re: Parallel OPM flow simulation

Thanks Alf for quick reply. Let me try the same in OSX. Thanks.

Regards
Kang

From: Alf Birger Rustad <abir at statoil.com<mailto:abir at statoil.com>>
Date: Monday, August 7, 2017 at 4:00 PM
To: Kangqiao Hu <kangqiaohu at gmail.com<mailto:kangqiaohu at gmail.com>>, "Opm at opm-project.org<mailto:Opm at opm-project.org>" <Opm at opm-project.org<mailto:Opm at opm-project.org>>
Subject: SV: Parallel OPM flow simulation

Hi Kang,

On OSX I am afraid you are on your own when it comes to MPI. On supported Linux distributions we have MPI enabled binaries packaged, and it is invoked in the standard way with mpirun.

Cheers,
Alf
________________________________
Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org<mailto:opm-bounces at opm-project.org>> på vegne av Kangqiao Hu <kangqiaohu at gmail.com<mailto:kangqiaohu at gmail.com>>
Sendt: 7. august 2017 19:45:19
Til: Opm at opm-project.org<mailto:Opm at opm-project.org>
Emne: [Opm] Parallel OPM flow simulation

Hi Everyone,

I am new to OPM and just had a successful build from source codes on Mac. I was trying to run SPE10 model2 with flow_legacy, and I found that it only utilized one core. I was wondering if there is a parallel option that I can make use all of the available cores? Thanks.

Regards
Kang


-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you




-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you

_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
Opm at opm-project.org<mailto:Opm at opm-project.org>
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170808/e1bd7f15/attachment.html>

From kangqiaohu at gmail.com  Mon Aug 14 03:13:52 2017
From: kangqiaohu at gmail.com (Kangqiao Hu)
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 23:13:52 -0400
Subject: [Opm] Typical Run-time for SPE10
Message-ID: <CAHC2y90mtwZvAV+6mwFsgG3LSe2fGBqr_NSVmWdhOxzmkaQ_SA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi everyone,

I am running spe10 model2 using flow with single thread on a Intel
i7-7820hk mobile processor, and the simulation has been running for more
than 4 days and it seems to be far from complete. I was wondering what is
the typical time of running this test case? Thanks!

Regards
Kang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170813/73348640/attachment.html>

From abir at statoil.com  Mon Aug 14 08:18:13 2017
From: abir at statoil.com (Alf Birger Rustad)
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 08:18:13 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Typical Run-time for SPE10
In-Reply-To: <CAHC2y90mtwZvAV+6mwFsgG3LSe2fGBqr_NSVmWdhOxzmkaQ_SA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHC2y90mtwZvAV+6mwFsgG3LSe2fGBqr_NSVmWdhOxzmkaQ_SA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <HE1PR06MB3209415129D49EBD58A3C986D58C0@HE1PR06MB3209.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Kang,


The short answer is that flow does not support running the model yet. The long answer is that SPE10 Model 2 is a two-phase upscaling study, and hence by nature not fond of the preconditioning routines used by default in flow (or some of the commercial simulators for that matter). The most obvious remedy to this is to exploit the fact that SPE10 Model 2 is a two-phase case, and to use algebraic multigrid based preconditioning. We just very recently landed a true two-phase simulator version of flow, which actually supports an AMG based linear solver. Adapting the deck to this reality may finally make SPE10 Model 2 run well with flow.


Cheers,

Alf

________________________________
Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av Kangqiao Hu <kangqiaohu at gmail.com>
Sendt: 14. august 2017 05:13
Til: Opm at opm-project.org
Emne: [Opm] Typical Run-time for SPE10

Hi everyone,

I am running spe10 model2 using flow with single thread on a Intel i7-7820hk mobile processor, and the simulation has been running for more than 4 days and it seems to be far from complete. I was wondering what is the typical time of running this test case? Thanks!

Regards
Kang


-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170814/75b68519/attachment.html>

From Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no  Thu Aug 17 19:34:22 2017
From: Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no (Atgeirr Rasmussen)
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 19:34:22 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Program and invitation OPM meeting 18-19 October in Bergen
Message-ID: <2D981798-4C98-46F0-840B-E1245BB5CC63@sintef.no>

Dear OPM community,

The program for this year's OPM meeting is posted on our webpage (http://opm-project.org/?p=926).

Please register here: https://goo.gl/forms/6yzNrhovgFEvyszg2
<https://goo.gl/forms/6yzNrhovgFEvyszg2>

We have reserved some hotel rooms (until 15.09) at Scandic Ørnen:  https://www.scandichotels.no/hotell/norge/bergen/scandic-ornen

Please send an email to tor.harald.sandve at iris.no<mailto:tor.harald.sandve at iris.no> for a registration code. Unfortunately you will have to pay for your stay at the hotel yourself.

Kind regards
Atgeirr Rasmussen and Tor Harald Sandve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170817/c2892878/attachment.html>

From kangqiaohu at gmail.com  Mon Aug 21 04:39:30 2017
From: kangqiaohu at gmail.com (Kangqiao Hu)
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:39:30 -0400
Subject: [Opm] Typical Run-time for SPE10
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR06MB3209415129D49EBD58A3C986D58C0@HE1PR06MB3209.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAHC2y90mtwZvAV+6mwFsgG3LSe2fGBqr_NSVmWdhOxzmkaQ_SA@mail.gmail.com>
 <HE1PR06MB3209415129D49EBD58A3C986D58C0@HE1PR06MB3209.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <CAHC2y913_L6qGtHbuLnNmGsuzzd9gpujiEjTdjFX+VTkHm3byw@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks Alf for the explanation. If I want to replace the current solver
with a custom one, where is a good place to start with? Is
NewtonIterationBlackoilInterleaved.cpp where the solvers are actually
defined?

Regards
Kang

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Alf Birger Rustad <abir at statoil.com> wrote:

> Hi Kang,
>
>
> The short answer is that flow does not support running the model yet. The
> long answer is that SPE10 Model 2 is a two-phase upscaling study, and hence
> by nature not fond of the preconditioning routines used by default in flow
> (or some of the commercial simulators for that matter). The most obvious
> remedy to this is to exploit the fact that SPE10 Model 2 is a two-phase
> case, and to use algebraic multigrid based preconditioning. We just very
> recently landed a true two-phase simulator version of flow, which actually
> supports an AMG based linear solver. Adapting the deck to this reality may
> finally make SPE10 Model 2 run well with flow.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Alf
>
> ------------------------------
> *Fra:* Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av Kangqiao Hu <
> kangqiaohu at gmail.com>
> *Sendt:* 14. august 2017 05:13
> *Til:* Opm at opm-project.org
> *Emne:* [Opm] Typical Run-time for SPE10
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am running spe10 model2 using flow with single thread on a Intel
> i7-7820hk mobile processor, and the simulation has been running for more
> than 4 days and it seems to be far from complete. I was wondering what is
> the typical time of running this test case? Thanks!
>
> Regards
> Kang
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
> information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
> addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
> this message.
> Thank you
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170821/f6e7ea63/attachment.html>

From abir at statoil.com  Mon Aug 21 07:15:11 2017
From: abir at statoil.com (Alf Birger Rustad)
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 07:15:11 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Typical Run-time for SPE10
In-Reply-To: <CAHC2y913_L6qGtHbuLnNmGsuzzd9gpujiEjTdjFX+VTkHm3byw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHC2y90mtwZvAV+6mwFsgG3LSe2fGBqr_NSVmWdhOxzmkaQ_SA@mail.gmail.com>
 <HE1PR06MB3209415129D49EBD58A3C986D58C0@HE1PR06MB3209.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>,
 <CAHC2y913_L6qGtHbuLnNmGsuzzd9gpujiEjTdjFX+VTkHm3byw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <HE1PR06MB3209A31401DE9FB2BA08E525D5870@HE1PR06MB3209.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>


Hi Kang,

Actually you do not need to do any code changes for the solvers that are supported. They can be chosen at run-time, with command-line parameters or a parameter file. I cannot remember this being documented on the internet yet though, but others may chime in with pointers on that. For the two-phase simulator, you can see its introduction here:
https://github.com/OPM/opm-simulators/pull/1235#issuecomment-311350607
Reading down the thread you will notice that there is a significant speed-up setting linear_solver_use_amg=true which will enable usage of Dune's AMG routine. The default preconditioner is incomplete LU factorization. Please note that the two-phase simulator is found in a separate binary, named flow_ebos_2p. If you adapt SPE10 Model2 to run with the two-phase simulator, we will be happy to accept the changes to the deck in opm-data.

Cheers,
Alf

________________________________
Fra: Kangqiao Hu <kangqiaohu at gmail.com>
Sendt: 21. august 2017 06:39
Til: Alf Birger Rustad
Kopi: Opm at opm-project.org
Emne: Re: [Opm] Typical Run-time for SPE10

Thanks Alf for the explanation. If I want to replace the current solver with a custom one, where is a good place to start with? Is NewtonIterationBlackoilInterleaved.cpp where the solvers are actually defined?

Regards
Kang

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Alf Birger Rustad <abir at statoil.com<mailto:abir at statoil.com>> wrote:

Hi Kang,


The short answer is that flow does not support running the model yet. The long answer is that SPE10 Model 2 is a two-phase upscaling study, and hence by nature not fond of the preconditioning routines used by default in flow (or some of the commercial simulators for that matter). The most obvious remedy to this is to exploit the fact that SPE10 Model 2 is a two-phase case, and to use algebraic multigrid based preconditioning. We just very recently landed a true two-phase simulator version of flow, which actually supports an AMG based linear solver. Adapting the deck to this reality may finally make SPE10 Model 2 run well with flow.


Cheers,

Alf

________________________________
Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org<mailto:opm-bounces at opm-project.org>> på vegne av Kangqiao Hu <kangqiaohu at gmail.com<mailto:kangqiaohu at gmail.com>>
Sendt: 14. august 2017 05:13
Til: Opm at opm-project.org<mailto:Opm at opm-project.org>
Emne: [Opm] Typical Run-time for SPE10

Hi everyone,

I am running spe10 model2 using flow with single thread on a Intel i7-7820hk mobile processor, and the simulation has been running for more than 4 days and it seems to be far from complete. I was wondering what is the typical time of running this test case? Thanks!

Regards
Kang


-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you



-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170821/18a64fb4/attachment.html>

From Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no  Thu Aug 31 08:56:01 2017
From: Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no (Atgeirr Rasmussen)
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 08:56:01 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Reminder: Invitation to participate in a survey, MSO4SC
Message-ID: <C72305D6-17B9-45B0-8DE1-34785C89F1E7@sintef.no>

Dear OPM community,


I am posting this on behalf of the MSO4SC project, in which we are participating, as seen in the recent news item on the OPM web page, http://opm-project.org/?p=897


This invitation was posted earlier this summer, I am repeating it as some may not have had the time or opportunity to participate.


Atgeirr Flø Rasmussen, SINTEF Digital


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Dear Sir or Madam,


Let me introduce to you MSO4SC, which is a Horizon 2020 (European Research program) project.

MSO4SC is short for „Mathematical Modeling, Simulation and Optimization for Societal Challenges with Scientific Computing“. The objective to build an e-infrastructure that supports both MSO application development and HPC performance for the developed application. It will solve the conflict between fast prototyping and scalability of the resulting applications by providing a platform to support a cloud-like deployment, explicitly recognizing the HPC and big-data demands of the applications. Visit www.mso4sc.eu<http://www.mso4sc.eu> for further information.


You can have your say in shaping the e-infrastructure by telling us about your experience, plans and/or obstacles regarding MSO-software. You will find our survey, which will take approx. 15 minutes, at
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeOTIIplgtMeuT-iJ2dWh_ujAXDPX64goSg0wXKeGlRWZgYEg/viewform?usp=sf_link


We thank you for your time and appreciate further input and comments. Visit www.mso4sc.eu<http://www.mso4sc.eu> and contact F. Javier Nieto (francisco.ni... at atos.net<http://atos.net>), Zoltan Horvath (horva... at math.sze.hu<http://math.sze.hu>) or Esther Klann (kl... at tu-berlin.de<http://tu-berlin.de>).


Best regards,
the MSO4SC team

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170831/10561cb0/attachment.html>