From sindimo at gmail.com  Fri May  4 09:15:36 2018
From: sindimo at gmail.com (sindimo)
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 05:15:36 -0400
Subject: [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0601MB231499E4F11BDF9A6C20B41FD98E0@HE1PR0601MB2314.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAPuYX8tWwwqXFKx+jqHnrw35RUURit6XYHuVujX1RcFGat0Fwg@mail.gmail.com>
 <HE1PR0601MB231499E4F11BDF9A6C20B41FD98E0@HE1PR0601MB2314.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <CACOQo+L0+z2281kCnnwsLwVb11QUxVH0k8kmSxfso8N7c1ucAg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Arne,

Thank you for your clarification, I really appreciate it.

I have updated to the latest OPM release of Flow 2018.04 and tested again
on RedHat 7. I still don't see any performance improvement with the new
RedHat 7 binaries as if MPI was still not working. On Ubuntu it works fine.

For example I ran the Norne model once on 1 processor and once on 2
processors on the RedHat 7 machine and the Ubuntu machine (identical
machines on Amazon AWS m4.2xlarge instances) and these are the timings I
get:


Norne on RedHat:
1 processor:  769.437 seconds
2 processors: 839.285 seconds

Norne on Ubuntu:
1 processor:  889.158 seconds
2 processors: 585 seconds


If I do "top" command on RedHat while job is launched on 2 processors, I
can see 2 processors running. However it doesn't seem that they are running
in parallel, it seems as if each process is running a separate serial copy
of flow, hence the run on 2 processors is even slower than the serial run.

Also a quick check using "ldd" on the flow binaries on both Ubuntu and
RedHat shows that the Ubuntu executable is indeed linked to the MPI
library, while the RedHat binary still doesn't show any linked MPI
libraries:


On Ubuntu:

ubuntu at ip-172-31-15-200:~$ ldd /usr/bin/flow | grep -i mpi
libmpi_cxx.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmpi_cxx.so.1 (0x00007f350423c000)
libmpi.so.12 => /usr/lib/libmpi.so.12 (0x00007f3503f66000)


On RedHat:

[ec2-user at ip-172-31-15-201 ~]$ ldd /usr/bin/flow | grep mpi
[ec2-user at ip-172-31-15-201 ~]$

[ec2-user at ip-172-31-15-201 ~]$ rpm -qa | grep opm
libopm-common1-2018.04-0.x86_64
opm-upscaling-devel-2018.04-0.x86_64
opm-simulators-bin-2018.04-0.x86_64
libopm-grid1-2018.04-0.x86_64
libopm-upscaling1-2018.04-0.x86_64
libopm-simulators1-2018.04-0.x86_64
opm-upscaling-2018.04-0.x86_64


I would appreciate any help with this please to get the parallel version of
Flow working on RedHat.

Thank you for all of your help.

Sincerely,

Mohamad


On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 2:26 AM, Arne Morten Kvarving <
Arne.Morten.Kvarving at sintef.no> wrote:

> hi,
>
>
> currently the rpm's are not mpi enabled. this will change in the upcoming
> 2018.04 release.
>
>
> it's a bit involved building on rhel, as you need some packages not in
> base or epel. in particular, you need to trilinos (or rather, just zoltan
> which is part of trilinos) to get efficient mpi support, as well as dune
> and such. if it's not extremely pressing i would suggest waiting for the
> release.
>
>
> arnem
> ------------------------------
> *Fra:* Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av M. S. <
> sindimo at gmail.com>
> *Sendt:* 25. april 2018 22:46:33
> *Til:* opm at opm-project.org
> *Emne:* [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support
>
> Dear All,
>
> I am interested in running OPM Flow with MPI support on RedHat 7.
>
> I've installed the binary packages on 2 different machines, one with
> RedHat 7 and the other with Ubuntu 16.04 using these instructions:
>
> https://opm-project.org/?page_id=245
>
> The Ubuntu packages ran fine with MPI and I can see performance
> improvement when running some of the SPE models, however the RedHat 7
> version doesn't seem to have been built with MPI support.
>
> RedHat 7 currently has native mpi package that can be easily installed by
> yum (based on mpich-3):
>
> sudo yum -y install mpich-devel
>
> Would someone be able please to build the Flow binaries for RedHat 7 with
> MPI support, or perhaps if they already exist can you please point me to
> where to get them?
>
> I attempted building from source code but the Flow third party library
> prerequisite installation seems overwhelming.
>
> If anyone already has their RedHat 7 build environment setup and would be
> able to help I would truly appreciate it. From the instructions on the
> website, it says to enable MPI support you just need to pass this option to
> cmake during the build “-DUSE_MPI=1” .
>
> Thank you for all of your help, I really appreciate it.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Mohamad Sindi
> MIT
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180504/48fd3b6e/attachment.html>

From Arne.Morten.Kvarving at sintef.no  Fri May  4 09:22:19 2018
From: Arne.Morten.Kvarving at sintef.no (Arne Morten Kvarving)
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 09:22:19 +0000
Subject: [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support
In-Reply-To: <CACOQo+L0+z2281kCnnwsLwVb11QUxVH0k8kmSxfso8N7c1ucAg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPuYX8tWwwqXFKx+jqHnrw35RUURit6XYHuVujX1RcFGat0Fwg@mail.gmail.com>
 <HE1PR0601MB231499E4F11BDF9A6C20B41FD98E0@HE1PR0601MB2314.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>,
 <CACOQo+L0+z2281kCnnwsLwVb11QUxVH0k8kmSxfso8N7c1ucAg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <HE1PR0601MB231446F590232F636A579A00D9860@HE1PR0601MB2314.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

hi there,


on redhat things work a little different. in particular there are separate packages for mpi.


you have to install opm-simulators-openmpi-bin


and load the mpi/openmpi-x86_64 module in the shell where you want to execute flow.


arnem

________________________________
Fra: saudiaramco at gmail.com <saudiaramco at gmail.com> på vegne av sindimo <sindimo at gmail.com>
Sendt: 4. mai 2018 11:15:36
Til: Arne Morten Kvarving; opm at opm-project.org
Emne: Re: [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support

Hi Arne,

Thank you for your clarification, I really appreciate it.

I have updated to the latest OPM release of Flow 2018.04 and tested again on RedHat 7. I still don't see any performance improvement with the new RedHat 7 binaries as if MPI was still not working. On Ubuntu it works fine.

For example I ran the Norne model once on 1 processor and once on 2 processors on the RedHat 7 machine and the Ubuntu machine (identical machines on Amazon AWS m4.2xlarge instances) and these are the timings I get:


Norne on RedHat:
1 processor:  769.437 seconds
2 processors: 839.285 seconds

Norne on Ubuntu:
1 processor:  889.158 seconds
2 processors: 585 seconds


If I do "top" command on RedHat while job is launched on 2 processors, I can see 2 processors running. However it doesn't seem that they are running in parallel, it seems as if each process is running a separate serial copy of flow, hence the run on 2 processors is even slower than the serial run.

Also a quick check using "ldd" on the flow binaries on both Ubuntu and RedHat shows that the Ubuntu executable is indeed linked to the MPI library, while the RedHat binary still doesn't show any linked MPI libraries:


On Ubuntu:

ubuntu at ip-172-31-15-200:~$ ldd /usr/bin/flow | grep -i mpi
libmpi_cxx.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmpi_cxx.so.1 (0x00007f350423c000)
libmpi.so.12 => /usr/lib/libmpi.so.12 (0x00007f3503f66000)


On RedHat:

[ec2-user at ip-172-31-15-201 ~]$ ldd /usr/bin/flow | grep mpi
[ec2-user at ip-172-31-15-201 ~]$

[ec2-user at ip-172-31-15-201 ~]$ rpm -qa | grep opm
libopm-common1-2018.04-0.x86_64
opm-upscaling-devel-2018.04-0.x86_64
opm-simulators-bin-2018.04-0.x86_64
libopm-grid1-2018.04-0.x86_64
libopm-upscaling1-2018.04-0.x86_64
libopm-simulators1-2018.04-0.x86_64
opm-upscaling-2018.04-0.x86_64


I would appreciate any help with this please to get the parallel version of Flow working on RedHat.

Thank you for all of your help.

Sincerely,

Mohamad


On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 2:26 AM, Arne Morten Kvarving <Arne.Morten.Kvarving at sintef.no<mailto:Arne.Morten.Kvarving at sintef.no>> wrote:

hi,


currently the rpm's are not mpi enabled. this will change in the upcoming 2018.04 release.


it's a bit involved building on rhel, as you need some packages not in base or epel. in particular, you need to trilinos (or rather, just zoltan which is part of trilinos) to get efficient mpi support, as well as dune and such. if it's not extremely pressing i would suggest waiting for the release.


arnem

________________________________
Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org<mailto:opm-bounces at opm-project.org>> på vegne av M. S. <sindimo at gmail.com<mailto:sindimo at gmail.com>>
Sendt: 25. april 2018 22:46:33
Til: opm at opm-project.org<mailto:opm at opm-project.org>
Emne: [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support

Dear All,

I am interested in running OPM Flow with MPI support on RedHat 7.

I've installed the binary packages on 2 different machines, one with RedHat 7 and the other with Ubuntu 16.04 using these instructions:

https://opm-project.org/?page_id=245

The Ubuntu packages ran fine with MPI and I can see performance improvement when running some of the SPE models, however the RedHat 7 version doesn't seem to have been built with MPI support.

RedHat 7 currently has native mpi package that can be easily installed by yum (based on mpich-3):

sudo yum -y install mpich-devel

Would someone be able please to build the Flow binaries for RedHat 7 with MPI support, or perhaps if they already exist can you please point me to where to get them?

I attempted building from source code but the Flow third party library prerequisite installation seems overwhelming.

If anyone already has their RedHat 7 build environment setup and would be able to help I would truly appreciate it. From the instructions on the website, it says to enable MPI support you just need to pass this option to cmake during the build “-DUSE_MPI=1” .

Thank you for all of your help, I really appreciate it.

Sincerely,

Mohamad Sindi
MIT

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180504/a0a662d1/attachment.html>

From abir at statoil.com  Fri May  4 10:18:30 2018
From: abir at statoil.com (Alf Birger Rustad)
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 10:18:30 +0000
Subject: [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0601MB231446F590232F636A579A00D9860@HE1PR0601MB2314.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAPuYX8tWwwqXFKx+jqHnrw35RUURit6XYHuVujX1RcFGat0Fwg@mail.gmail.com>
 <HE1PR0601MB231499E4F11BDF9A6C20B41FD98E0@HE1PR0601MB2314.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>,
 <CACOQo+L0+z2281kCnnwsLwVb11QUxVH0k8kmSxfso8N7c1ucAg@mail.gmail.com>
 <HE1PR0601MB231446F590232F636A579A00D9860@HE1PR0601MB2314.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <HE1PR0601MB20258A9DFDB27639F85F5D2DD5860@HE1PR0601MB2025.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Mohamad,

As Arne Morten says, you will need to tell Red Hat what MPI version to use. The way this is done is by first making the module command available. You achieve this by the following command:
. /usr/share/Modules/init/bash

Now you can query for installed modules with:
module avail

Lastly, you can tell it to use openmpi with:
module add mpi/openmpi-x86_64

On ubuntu, you do not need to do anything. If openmpi is installed, mpirun just works.

Cheers,
Alf

From: Opm [mailto:opm-bounces at opm-project.org] On Behalf Of Arne Morten Kvarving
Sent: 4. mai 2018 11:22
To: sindimo <sindimo at gmail.com>; opm at opm-project.org
Subject: Re: [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support


hi there,



on redhat things work a little different. in particular there are separate packages for mpi.



you have to install opm-simulators-openmpi-bin



and load the mpi/openmpi-x86_64 module in the shell where you want to execute flow.



arnem

________________________________
Fra: saudiaramco at gmail.com<mailto:saudiaramco at gmail.com> <saudiaramco at gmail.com<mailto:saudiaramco at gmail.com>> på vegne av sindimo <sindimo at gmail.com<mailto:sindimo at gmail.com>>
Sendt: 4. mai 2018 11:15:36
Til: Arne Morten Kvarving; opm at opm-project.org<mailto:opm at opm-project.org>
Emne: Re: [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support

Hi Arne,

Thank you for your clarification, I really appreciate it.

I have updated to the latest OPM release of Flow 2018.04 and tested again on RedHat 7. I still don't see any performance improvement with the new RedHat 7 binaries as if MPI was still not working. On Ubuntu it works fine.

For example I ran the Norne model once on 1 processor and once on 2 processors on the RedHat 7 machine and the Ubuntu machine (identical machines on Amazon AWS m4.2xlarge instances) and these are the timings I get:


Norne on RedHat:
1 processor:  769.437 seconds
2 processors: 839.285 seconds

Norne on Ubuntu:
1 processor:  889.158 seconds
2 processors: 585 seconds


If I do "top" command on RedHat while job is launched on 2 processors, I can see 2 processors running. However it doesn't seem that they are running in parallel, it seems as if each process is running a separate serial copy of flow, hence the run on 2 processors is even slower than the serial run.

Also a quick check using "ldd" on the flow binaries on both Ubuntu and RedHat shows that the Ubuntu executable is indeed linked to the MPI library, while the RedHat binary still doesn't show any linked MPI libraries:


On Ubuntu:

ubuntu at ip-172-31-15-200:~$ ldd /usr/bin/flow | grep -i mpi
libmpi_cxx.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmpi_cxx.so.1 (0x00007f350423c000)
libmpi.so.12 => /usr/lib/libmpi.so.12 (0x00007f3503f66000)


On RedHat:

[ec2-user at ip-172-31-15-201 ~]$ ldd /usr/bin/flow | grep mpi
[ec2-user at ip-172-31-15-201 ~]$

[ec2-user at ip-172-31-15-201 ~]$ rpm -qa | grep opm
libopm-common1-2018.04-0.x86_64
opm-upscaling-devel-2018.04-0.x86_64
opm-simulators-bin-2018.04-0.x86_64
libopm-grid1-2018.04-0.x86_64
libopm-upscaling1-2018.04-0.x86_64
libopm-simulators1-2018.04-0.x86_64
opm-upscaling-2018.04-0.x86_64


I would appreciate any help with this please to get the parallel version of Flow working on RedHat.

Thank you for all of your help.

Sincerely,

Mohamad


On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 2:26 AM, Arne Morten Kvarving <Arne.Morten.Kvarving at sintef.no<mailto:Arne.Morten.Kvarving at sintef.no>> wrote:

hi,



currently the rpm's are not mpi enabled. this will change in the upcoming 2018.04 release.



it's a bit involved building on rhel, as you need some packages not in base or epel. in particular, you need to trilinos (or rather, just zoltan which is part of trilinos) to get efficient mpi support, as well as dune and such. if it's not extremely pressing i would suggest waiting for the release.



arnem

________________________________
Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org<mailto:opm-bounces at opm-project.org>> på vegne av M. S. <sindimo at gmail.com<mailto:sindimo at gmail.com>>
Sendt: 25. april 2018 22:46:33
Til: opm at opm-project.org<mailto:opm at opm-project.org>
Emne: [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support

Dear All,

I am interested in running OPM Flow with MPI support on RedHat 7.

I've installed the binary packages on 2 different machines, one with RedHat 7 and the other with Ubuntu 16.04 using these instructions:

https://opm-project.org/?page_id=245

The Ubuntu packages ran fine with MPI and I can see performance improvement when running some of the SPE models, however the RedHat 7 version doesn't seem to have been built with MPI support.

RedHat 7 currently has native mpi package that can be easily installed by yum (based on mpich-3):

sudo yum -y install mpich-devel

Would someone be able please to build the Flow binaries for RedHat 7 with MPI support, or perhaps if they already exist can you please point me to where to get them?

I attempted building from source code but the Flow third party library prerequisite installation seems overwhelming.

If anyone already has their RedHat 7 build environment setup and would be able to help I would truly appreciate it. From the instructions on the website, it says to enable MPI support you just need to pass this option to cmake during the build "-DUSE_MPI=1" .

Thank you for all of your help, I really appreciate it.

Sincerely,

Mohamad Sindi
MIT



-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180504/a1cb3be3/attachment.html>

From Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no  Fri May  4 12:19:17 2018
From: Atgeirr.Rasmussen at sintef.no (Atgeirr Rasmussen)
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 12:19:17 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Redhat packages available for release 2018.04
Message-ID: <DB6PR06MB3925B7E5665A511B9336F38DF5860@DB6PR06MB3925.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

Dear OPM community,

Binary packages for redhat are now available with mpi support using openmpi. They are built according to redhat standards, i.e., there are separate packages with the mpi support.

To install the serial 'flow', you do as usual: "yum install opm-simulators-bin".
To install the mpi enabled packages you use: "yum install opm-simulators-openmpi-bin".

Remember that you have to enable the openmpi module, e.g:

"module load mpi/openmpi-x86_64"

in the terminal where you want to use the mpi enabled binaries.


Atgeirr (on behalf of Arne Morten)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180504/b181b7ed/attachment.html>

From sindimo at gmail.com  Sun May  6 23:56:37 2018
From: sindimo at gmail.com (sindimo)
Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 19:56:37 -0400
Subject: [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0601MB20258A9DFDB27639F85F5D2DD5860@HE1PR0601MB2025.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAPuYX8tWwwqXFKx+jqHnrw35RUURit6XYHuVujX1RcFGat0Fwg@mail.gmail.com>
 <HE1PR0601MB231499E4F11BDF9A6C20B41FD98E0@HE1PR0601MB2314.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <CACOQo+L0+z2281kCnnwsLwVb11QUxVH0k8kmSxfso8N7c1ucAg@mail.gmail.com>
 <HE1PR0601MB231446F590232F636A579A00D9860@HE1PR0601MB2314.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <HE1PR0601MB20258A9DFDB27639F85F5D2DD5860@HE1PR0601MB2025.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <CACOQo+Jd5vAEdGKi-dkBuVONU=JCrM+nnXPWGbWB8++250kxSQ@mail.gmail.com>

Dear Arne and Alf,

Thank you for the clarifications.

I am using the below yum repo found on the OPM website when doing the
installation. When installing the opm-simulators-openmpi-bin package to get
the mpi binaries it fails to install with the below errors related to
dependencies of trilinos. Is there another missing yum repo that I need to
add to resolve these broken dependencies?

Many thanks!


sudo yum-config-manager --add-repo
http://www.opm-project.org/package/opm.repo

sudo yum install opm-simulators-bin                         <-----This
installs fine

sudo yum install opm-simulators-openmpi-bin          <-----This fails


--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: trilinos-11.2.5-1.12.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libscotcherr.so.0()(64bit)
Error: Package: trilinos-11.2.5-1.12.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libscotch.so.0()(64bit)
Error: Package: trilinos-11.2.5-1.12.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libdmumps-5.1.2.so()(64bit)
Error: Package: libopm-simulators1-openmpi-2018.04-0.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libptscotcherr.so.0()(64bit)
Error: Package: libopm-simulators1-openmpi-2018.04-0.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libptscotch.so.0()(64bit)
Error: Package: libopm-simulators1-openmpi-2018.04-0.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libscotch.so.0()(64bit)
Error: Package: trilinos-11.2.5-1.12.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libglpk.so.36()(64bit)
Error: Package: opm-simulators-openmpi-bin-2018.04-0.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libptscotcherr.so.0()(64bit)
Error: Package: opm-simulators-openmpi-bin-2018.04-0.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libscotch.so.0()(64bit)
Error: Package: opm-simulators-openmpi-bin-2018.04-0.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libptscotch.so.0()(64bit)
Error: Package: trilinos-11.2.5-1.12.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libpord-5.1.2.so()(64bit)
Error: Package: trilinos-11.2.5-1.12.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libhdf5.so.8()(64bit)


On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 6:18 AM, Alf Birger Rustad <abir at statoil.com> wrote:

> Hi Mohamad,
>
>
>
> As Arne Morten says, you will need to tell Red Hat what MPI version to
> use. The way this is done is by first making the module command available.
> You achieve this by the following command:
>
> . /usr/share/Modules/init/bash
>
>
>
> Now you can query for installed modules with:
>
> module avail
>
>
>
> Lastly, you can tell it to use openmpi with:
>
> module add mpi/openmpi-x86_64
>
>
>
> On ubuntu, you do not need to do anything. If openmpi is installed, mpirun
> just works.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Alf
>
>
>
> *From:* Opm [mailto:opm-bounces at opm-project.org] *On Behalf Of *Arne
> Morten Kvarving
> *Sent:* 4. mai 2018 11:22
> *To:* sindimo <sindimo at gmail.com>; opm at opm-project.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI
> Support
>
>
>
> hi there,
>
>
>
> on redhat things work a little different. in particular there are separate
> packages for mpi.
>
>
>
> you have to install opm-simulators-openmpi-bin
>
>
>
> and load the mpi/openmpi-x86_64 module in the shell where you want to
> execute flow.
>
>
>
> arnem
> ------------------------------
>
> *Fra:* saudiaramco at gmail.com <saudiaramco at gmail.com> på vegne av sindimo <
> sindimo at gmail.com>
> *Sendt:* 4. mai 2018 11:15:36
> *Til:* Arne Morten Kvarving; opm at opm-project.org
> *Emne:* Re: [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support
>
>
>
> Hi Arne,
>
>
>
> Thank you for your clarification, I really appreciate it.
>
>
>
> I have updated to the latest OPM release of Flow 2018.04 and tested again
> on RedHat 7. I still don't see any performance improvement with the new
> RedHat 7 binaries as if MPI was still not working. On Ubuntu it works fine.
>
>
>
> For example I ran the Norne model once on 1 processor and once on 2
> processors on the RedHat 7 machine and the Ubuntu machine (identical
> machines on Amazon AWS m4.2xlarge instances) and these are the timings I
> get:
>
>
>
>
>
> Norne on RedHat:
>
> 1 processor:  769.437 seconds
>
> 2 processors: 839.285 seconds
>
>
>
> Norne on Ubuntu:
>
> 1 processor:  889.158 seconds
>
> 2 processors: 585 seconds
>
>
>
>
>
> If I do "top" command on RedHat while job is launched on 2 processors, I
> can see 2 processors running. However it doesn't seem that they are running
> in parallel, it seems as if each process is running a separate serial copy
> of flow, hence the run on 2 processors is even slower than the serial run.
>
>
>
> Also a quick check using "ldd" on the flow binaries on both Ubuntu and
> RedHat shows that the Ubuntu executable is indeed linked to the MPI
> library, while the RedHat binary still doesn't show any linked MPI
> libraries:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Ubuntu:
>
>
>
> ubuntu at ip-172-31-15-200:~$ ldd /usr/bin/flow | grep -i mpi
>
> libmpi_cxx.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmpi_cxx.so.1 (0x00007f350423c000)
>
> libmpi.so.12 => /usr/lib/libmpi.so.12 (0x00007f3503f66000)
>
>
>
>
>
> On RedHat:
>
>
>
> [ec2-user at ip-172-31-15-201 ~]$ ldd /usr/bin/flow | grep mpi
>
> [ec2-user at ip-172-31-15-201 ~]$
>
>
>
> [ec2-user at ip-172-31-15-201 ~]$ rpm -qa | grep opm
>
> libopm-common1-2018.04-0.x86_64
>
> opm-upscaling-devel-2018.04-0.x86_64
>
> opm-simulators-bin-2018.04-0.x86_64
>
> libopm-grid1-2018.04-0.x86_64
>
> libopm-upscaling1-2018.04-0.x86_64
>
> libopm-simulators1-2018.04-0.x86_64
>
> opm-upscaling-2018.04-0.x86_64
>
>
>
>
>
> I would appreciate any help with this please to get the parallel version
> of Flow working on RedHat.
>
>
>
> Thank you for all of your help.
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Mohamad
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 2:26 AM, Arne Morten Kvarving <
> Arne.Morten.Kvarving at sintef.no> wrote:
>
> hi,
>
>
>
> currently the rpm's are not mpi enabled. this will change in the upcoming
> 2018.04 release.
>
>
>
> it's a bit involved building on rhel, as you need some packages not in
> base or epel. in particular, you need to trilinos (or rather, just zoltan
> which is part of trilinos) to get efficient mpi support, as well as dune
> and such. if it's not extremely pressing i would suggest waiting for the
> release.
>
>
>
> arnem
> ------------------------------
>
> *Fra:* Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av M. S. <
> sindimo at gmail.com>
> *Sendt:* 25. april 2018 22:46:33
> *Til:* opm at opm-project.org
> *Emne:* [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> I am interested in running OPM Flow with MPI support on RedHat 7.
>
>
>
> I've installed the binary packages on 2 different machines, one with
> RedHat 7 and the other with Ubuntu 16.04 using these instructions:
>
>
>
> https://opm-project.org/?page_id=245
>
>
>
> The Ubuntu packages ran fine with MPI and I can see performance
> improvement when running some of the SPE models, however the RedHat 7
> version doesn't seem to have been built with MPI support.
>
>
>
> RedHat 7 currently has native mpi package that can be easily installed by
> yum (based on mpich-3):
>
>
>
> sudo yum -y install mpich-devel
>
>
>
> Would someone be able please to build the Flow binaries for RedHat 7 with
> MPI support, or perhaps if they already exist can you please point me to
> where to get them?
>
>
>
> I attempted building from source code but the Flow third party library
> prerequisite installation seems overwhelming.
>
>
>
> If anyone already has their RedHat 7 build environment setup and would be
> able to help I would truly appreciate it. From the instructions on the
> website, it says to enable MPI support you just need to pass this option to
> cmake during the build “-DUSE_MPI=1” .
>
>
>
> Thank you for all of your help, I really appreciate it.
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Mohamad Sindi
>
> MIT
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
> information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
> addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
> this message.
> Thank you
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180506/ddeb5fa1/attachment.html>

From Arne.Morten.Kvarving at sintef.no  Mon May  7 06:13:14 2018
From: Arne.Morten.Kvarving at sintef.no (Arne Morten Kvarving)
Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 06:13:14 +0000
Subject: [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support
In-Reply-To: <CACOQo+Jd5vAEdGKi-dkBuVONU=JCrM+nnXPWGbWB8++250kxSQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPuYX8tWwwqXFKx+jqHnrw35RUURit6XYHuVujX1RcFGat0Fwg@mail.gmail.com>
 <HE1PR0601MB231499E4F11BDF9A6C20B41FD98E0@HE1PR0601MB2314.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <CACOQo+L0+z2281kCnnwsLwVb11QUxVH0k8kmSxfso8N7c1ucAg@mail.gmail.com>
 <HE1PR0601MB231446F590232F636A579A00D9860@HE1PR0601MB2314.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <HE1PR0601MB20258A9DFDB27639F85F5D2DD5860@HE1PR0601MB2025.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>,
 <CACOQo+Jd5vAEdGKi-dkBuVONU=JCrM+nnXPWGbWB8++250kxSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AM0PR06MB420940B71CEA18031B96ADE5D99B0@AM0PR06MB4209.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

hi,


i suspect you have not enabled the epel repo (extra packages for enterprise linux). epel is required.


arnem

________________________________
Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av sindimo <sindimo at gmail.com>
Sendt: mandag 7. mai 2018 01.56.37
Til: Alf Birger Rustad; Arne Morten Kvarving; opm at opm-project.org
Emne: Re: [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support

Dear Arne and Alf,

Thank you for the clarifications.

I am using the below yum repo found on the OPM website when doing the installation. When installing the opm-simulators-openmpi-bin package to get the mpi binaries it fails to install with the below errors related to dependencies of trilinos. Is there another missing yum repo that I need to add to resolve these broken dependencies?

Many thanks!


sudo yum-config-manager --add-repo http://www.opm-project.org/package/opm.repo

sudo yum install opm-simulators-bin                         <-----This installs fine

sudo yum install opm-simulators-openmpi-bin          <-----This fails


--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: trilinos-11.2.5-1.12.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libscotcherr.so.0()(64bit)
Error: Package: trilinos-11.2.5-1.12.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libscotch.so.0()(64bit)
Error: Package: trilinos-11.2.5-1.12.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libdmumps-5.1.2.so<http://libdmumps-5.1.2.so>()(64bit)
Error: Package: libopm-simulators1-openmpi-2018.04-0.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libptscotcherr.so.0()(64bit)
Error: Package: libopm-simulators1-openmpi-2018.04-0.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libptscotch.so.0()(64bit)
Error: Package: libopm-simulators1-openmpi-2018.04-0.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libscotch.so.0()(64bit)
Error: Package: trilinos-11.2.5-1.12.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libglpk.so.36()(64bit)
Error: Package: opm-simulators-openmpi-bin-2018.04-0.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libptscotcherr.so.0()(64bit)
Error: Package: opm-simulators-openmpi-bin-2018.04-0.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libscotch.so.0()(64bit)
Error: Package: opm-simulators-openmpi-bin-2018.04-0.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libptscotch.so.0()(64bit)
Error: Package: trilinos-11.2.5-1.12.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libpord-5.1.2.so<http://libpord-5.1.2.so>()(64bit)
Error: Package: trilinos-11.2.5-1.12.x86_64 (opm)
           Requires: libhdf5.so.8()(64bit)


On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 6:18 AM, Alf Birger Rustad <abir at statoil.com<mailto:abir at statoil.com>> wrote:

Hi Mohamad,



As Arne Morten says, you will need to tell Red Hat what MPI version to use. The way this is done is by first making the module command available. You achieve this by the following command:

. /usr/share/Modules/init/bash



Now you can query for installed modules with:

module avail



Lastly, you can tell it to use openmpi with:

module add mpi/openmpi-x86_64



On ubuntu, you do not need to do anything. If openmpi is installed, mpirun just works.



Cheers,

Alf



From: Opm [mailto:opm-bounces at opm-project.org<mailto:opm-bounces at opm-project.org>] On Behalf Of Arne Morten Kvarving
Sent: 4. mai 2018 11:22
To: sindimo <sindimo at gmail.com<mailto:sindimo at gmail.com>>; opm at opm-project.org<mailto:opm at opm-project.org>
Subject: Re: [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support



hi there,



on redhat things work a little different. in particular there are separate packages for mpi.



you have to install opm-simulators-openmpi-bin



and load the mpi/openmpi-x86_64 module in the shell where you want to execute flow.



arnem

________________________________

Fra: saudiaramco at gmail.com<mailto:saudiaramco at gmail.com> <saudiaramco at gmail.com<mailto:saudiaramco at gmail.com>> på vegne av sindimo <sindimo at gmail.com<mailto:sindimo at gmail.com>>
Sendt: 4. mai 2018 11:15:36
Til: Arne Morten Kvarving; opm at opm-project.org<mailto:opm at opm-project.org>
Emne: Re: [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support



Hi Arne,



Thank you for your clarification, I really appreciate it.



I have updated to the latest OPM release of Flow 2018.04 and tested again on RedHat 7. I still don't see any performance improvement with the new RedHat 7 binaries as if MPI was still not working. On Ubuntu it works fine.



For example I ran the Norne model once on 1 processor and once on 2 processors on the RedHat 7 machine and the Ubuntu machine (identical machines on Amazon AWS m4.2xlarge instances) and these are the timings I get:





Norne on RedHat:

1 processor:  769.437 seconds

2 processors: 839.285 seconds



Norne on Ubuntu:

1 processor:  889.158 seconds

2 processors: 585 seconds





If I do "top" command on RedHat while job is launched on 2 processors, I can see 2 processors running. However it doesn't seem that they are running in parallel, it seems as if each process is running a separate serial copy of flow, hence the run on 2 processors is even slower than the serial run.



Also a quick check using "ldd" on the flow binaries on both Ubuntu and RedHat shows that the Ubuntu executable is indeed linked to the MPI library, while the RedHat binary still doesn't show any linked MPI libraries:





On Ubuntu:



ubuntu at ip-172-31-15-200:~$ ldd /usr/bin/flow | grep -i mpi

libmpi_cxx.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmpi_cxx.so.1 (0x00007f350423c000)

libmpi.so.12 => /usr/lib/libmpi.so.12 (0x00007f3503f66000)





On RedHat:



[ec2-user at ip-172-31-15-201 ~]$ ldd /usr/bin/flow | grep mpi

[ec2-user at ip-172-31-15-201 ~]$



[ec2-user at ip-172-31-15-201 ~]$ rpm -qa | grep opm

libopm-common1-2018.04-0.x86_64

opm-upscaling-devel-2018.04-0.x86_64

opm-simulators-bin-2018.04-0.x86_64

libopm-grid1-2018.04-0.x86_64

libopm-upscaling1-2018.04-0.x86_64

libopm-simulators1-2018.04-0.x86_64

opm-upscaling-2018.04-0.x86_64





I would appreciate any help with this please to get the parallel version of Flow working on RedHat.



Thank you for all of your help.



Sincerely,



Mohamad





On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 2:26 AM, Arne Morten Kvarving <Arne.Morten.Kvarving at sintef.no<mailto:Arne.Morten.Kvarving at sintef.no>> wrote:

hi,



currently the rpm's are not mpi enabled. this will change in the upcoming 2018.04 release.



it's a bit involved building on rhel, as you need some packages not in base or epel. in particular, you need to trilinos (or rather, just zoltan which is part of trilinos) to get efficient mpi support, as well as dune and such. if it's not extremely pressing i would suggest waiting for the release.



arnem

________________________________

Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org<mailto:opm-bounces at opm-project.org>> på vegne av M. S. <sindimo at gmail.com<mailto:sindimo at gmail.com>>
Sendt: 25. april 2018 22:46:33
Til: opm at opm-project.org<mailto:opm at opm-project.org>
Emne: [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support



Dear All,



I am interested in running OPM Flow with MPI support on RedHat 7.



I've installed the binary packages on 2 different machines, one with RedHat 7 and the other with Ubuntu 16.04 using these instructions:



https://opm-project.org/?page_id=245



The Ubuntu packages ran fine with MPI and I can see performance improvement when running some of the SPE models, however the RedHat 7 version doesn't seem to have been built with MPI support.



RedHat 7 currently has native mpi package that can be easily installed by yum (based on mpich-3):



sudo yum -y install mpich-devel



Would someone be able please to build the Flow binaries for RedHat 7 with MPI support, or perhaps if they already exist can you please point me to where to get them?



I attempted building from source code but the Flow third party library prerequisite installation seems overwhelming.



If anyone already has their RedHat 7 build environment setup and would be able to help I would truly appreciate it. From the instructions on the website, it says to enable MPI support you just need to pass this option to cmake during the build “-DUSE_MPI=1” .



Thank you for all of your help, I really appreciate it.



Sincerely,



Mohamad Sindi

MIT




-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180507/29e24312/attachment.html>

From adamwatt08 at gmail.com  Mon May  7 20:38:41 2018
From: adamwatt08 at gmail.com (Adam Watt)
Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 21:38:41 +0100
Subject: [Opm] PowerShell issue
Message-ID: <CAHFNNyskzCSDK0LQ1_kp-jBxtFLArYXmdsKb=1H5ikNn1ej5YA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

I am new to this software and plan on using it for my MSc thesis.

I am looking for some advice, a little issue with installing:



I am running windows 10 and get the above message. Is there a fix to this
and if so can you advise?

Regards

Adam Watt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180507/538b7653/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 13011 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180507/538b7653/attachment.png>

From and at poware.org  Tue May  8 09:42:44 2018
From: and at poware.org (Andreas Lauser)
Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 11:42:44 +0200
Subject: [Opm] PowerShell issue
In-Reply-To: <CAHFNNyskzCSDK0LQ1_kp-jBxtFLArYXmdsKb=1H5ikNn1ej5YA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHFNNyskzCSDK0LQ1_kp-jBxtFLArYXmdsKb=1H5ikNn1ej5YA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <18171597.6fHcx2yZS1@singularius>

Hi,

On Monday, May 7, 2018 10:38:41 PM CEST Adam Watt wrote:
> I am new to this software and plan on using it for my MSc thesis.
> 
> I am looking for some advice, a little issue with installing:
> 
> 
> 
> I am running windows 10 and get the above message. Is there a fix to this
> and if so can you advise?

the installation instructions for windows on the website should probably be 
updated: It is preferable to use WSL on windows 10 instead of a virtual 
machine:

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/install-win10

after this, the installation instructions for Ubuntu apply. (be aware that 
compared to native linux, the performance of the simulators is generally 
slightly worse on windows.)

cheers
  Andreas

-- 
With great power come great bugs.
-- Narcisa Vasile
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180508/f3d9cab9/attachment.sig>

From diego.nicolas.corbo at gmail.com  Wed May  9 07:38:19 2018
From: diego.nicolas.corbo at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Diego_Nicol=C3=A1s_Corbo?=)
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 08:38:19 +0100
Subject: [Opm] Fracture conductivity/Skin degradation function
Message-ID: <CAHhf9RsywMqMK9VruQuoLYgKUxgdvUi3rdA4yT1FcfqiGqXM6Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,


I am a new user, and I am aiming to use Flow to simulate hydraulically
stimulated horizontal wells in shale oil reservoirs for my MSc thesis.


I was wondering if is there any keyword allowing the reduction of the
hydraulic fracture permeability/Skin factor through a time or pressure
dependent function.


Many thanks in advance for your support,


Cheers,

Diego Corbo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180509/73e04d28/attachment.html>

From Kai.Bao at sintef.no  Wed May  9 07:52:29 2018
From: Kai.Bao at sintef.no (Kai Bao)
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 07:52:29 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Fracture conductivity/Skin degradation function
In-Reply-To: <CAHhf9RsywMqMK9VruQuoLYgKUxgdvUi3rdA4yT1FcfqiGqXM6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHhf9RsywMqMK9VruQuoLYgKUxgdvUi3rdA4yT1FcfqiGqXM6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <HE1PR0601MB2395A309C7987CEEFA2215E8F7990@HE1PR0601MB2395.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

Hi,


Good to know your interest in OPM.


I am not sure about your model of hydraulic fracture permeability. But currently, the only way you can modify the skin factor is through the COMPDAT keyword. To mimic the the skin factor dependent on time, maybe you can just change the skin factor of COMPDAT with SCHEDULE.  Skin factor depending on pressure is something we need to build new well model, which we do not have.


I am not particularly familiar with the hydraulic fracturing with Eclipse. If it is some functionality available in Eclipse, please refer me to that.  If you want to develop the functionality you need in Flow and time permits, I would like to help you.


Best,

Kai



________________________________
From: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> on behalf of Diego Nicolás Corbo <diego.nicolas.corbo at gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 9:38:19 AM
To: opm at opm-project.org
Subject: [Opm] Fracture conductivity/Skin degradation function


Hello,


I am a new user, and I am aiming to use Flow to simulate hydraulically stimulated horizontal wells in shale oil reservoirs for my MSc thesis.


I was wondering if is there any keyword allowing the reduction of the hydraulic fracture permeability/Skin factor through a time or pressure dependent function.


Many thanks in advance for your support,


Cheers,

Diego Corbo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180509/9687a96c/attachment.html>

From adamwatt08 at gmail.com  Fri May 11 07:51:26 2018
From: adamwatt08 at gmail.com (Adam Watt)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 08:51:26 +0100
Subject: [Opm] Eclipse File Issues
Message-ID: <CAHFNNyuT5zd-TggGwhCfaCrvGvqt5=PNKFkDv7Dt8DgLPfwjng@mail.gmail.com>

 Hi,

I am trying to run Eclipse models within the programme. I have been given
the models. I am running on Windows 10. When I try to run the model I get
the following error. Is there any advice on how to get this model to run.
The files have been placed into the Norne folder for convenience.



Regards

Adam Watt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180511/e63b4acf/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 18416 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180511/e63b4acf/attachment.png>

From Tor.Harald.Sandve at iris.no  Fri May 11 08:50:33 2018
From: Tor.Harald.Sandve at iris.no (Tor Harald Sandve)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 08:50:33 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Eclipse File Issues
In-Reply-To: <CAHFNNyuT5zd-TggGwhCfaCrvGvqt5=PNKFkDv7Dt8DgLPfwjng@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHFNNyuT5zd-TggGwhCfaCrvGvqt5=PNKFkDv7Dt8DgLPfwjng@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AM0PR05MB4740766C57BECB707D669147A49F0@AM0PR05MB4740.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Adam


Flow does not support FILLEPS


The simplest solution is to just remove it from the deck. If you need FILLEPS for your problem, I suggest you add it as an github issue in OPM/opm-common.


The complete list of supported (and also many of the yet not supported) keywords is documented in our manual.


https://opm-project.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/OPM-Flow-Documentation-2017-10-Rev-0.pdf


Tor Harald

________________________________
From: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> on behalf of Adam Watt <adamwatt08 at gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 9:51:26 AM
To: opm at opm-project.org
Subject: [Opm] Eclipse File Issues

Hi,

I am trying to run Eclipse models within the programme. I have been given the models. I am running on Windows 10. When I try to run the model I get the following error. Is there any advice on how to get this model to run. The files have been placed into the Norne folder for convenience.

[cid:ii_jh1nxd3k0_1634e2eb5047a007]

Regards

Adam Watt

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180511/c63716d1/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 18416 bytes
Desc: image.png
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180511/c63716d1/attachment.png>

From abir at equinor.com  Mon May 28 11:14:22 2018
From: abir at equinor.com (Alf Birger Rustad)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 11:14:22 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Scheduled maintenance
Message-ID: <HE1PR0601MB20253FF290F181559FD4F5FAD66E0@HE1PR0601MB2025.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

Dear OPM community,

Our needs are growing, and we need to upgrade one of our servers to a more powerful machine. In doing so, we need to reboot  the machine hosting our home page, mailing list, wiki and Red Hat packages. Hence, we do expect some downtime on all these services tomorrow, but will try to make it swift. Sorry for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Best regards,
Alf Rustad


-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180528/63450b0e/attachment.html>

From abir at equinor.com  Mon May 28 12:34:11 2018
From: abir at equinor.com (Alf Birger Rustad)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 12:34:11 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Scheduled maintenance done
Message-ID: <HE1PR0601MB202561D7F141A8881BCE1EF4D66E0@HE1PR0601MB2025.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

Dear OPM community,

Scheduled maintenance is now done, and all services seems to be up and running as they should. Please inform us if you are experiencing any problems.

Best regards,
Alf Rustad

From: Opm [mailto:opm-bounces at opm-project.org] On Behalf Of Alf Birger Rustad
Sent: 28. mai 2018 13:14
To: opm at opm-project.org
Subject: [Opm] Scheduled maintenance

Dear OPM community,

Our needs are growing, and we need to upgrade one of our servers to a more powerful machine. In doing so, we need to reboot  the machine hosting our home page, mailing list, wiki and Red Hat packages. Hence, we do expect some downtime on all these services tomorrow, but will try to make it swift. Sorry for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Best regards,
Alf Rustad


-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you


-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180528/0016d23a/attachment.html>

From carlpaatur at hotmail.com  Mon May 28 15:41:41 2018
From: carlpaatur at hotmail.com (c berg)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 15:41:41 +0000
Subject: [Opm] OPM on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver)
Message-ID: <HE1PR0602MB364124ED772A1A462443868CD06E0@HE1PR0602MB3641.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

Hi,


I just tried to install OPM on OPM on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver) following the recipe for 16.04 on the OPM website. Unfortunately it seem like it does not have a 18.04 release file yet. Are there any plans for adding such a release file?


/Carl Fredrik
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180528/ea929f7f/attachment.html>

From david.baxendale at gmail.com  Tue May 29 01:07:35 2018
From: david.baxendale at gmail.com (David Baxendale (Private))
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 09:07:35 +0800
Subject: [Opm] Opm Digest, Vol 31, Issue 9
In-Reply-To: <mailman.1.1527508801.1189.opm@opm-project.org>
References: <mailman.1.1527508801.1189.opm@opm-project.org>
Message-ID: <fae92cbf-e47c-1168-e6df-454f60ab510b@gmail.com>

Rui,

If you just want to plot the summary data you can use OPM ResInsight 
instead and you can also export the plotted data as well.
ThunderBird Signature File

Regards, David

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 28-May-18 20:00, opm-request at opm-project.org wrote:
> Send Opm mailing list submissions to
> 	opm at opm-project.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	opm-request at opm-project.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	opm-owner at opm-project.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Opm digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>     1. Re: Problem with installing python-ert.ecl (Rui Xu)
>     2. Scheduled maintenance (Alf Birger Rustad)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 17:01:21 -0700
> From: Rui Xu <rxu at exa.com>
> To: opm at opm-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Opm] Problem with installing python-ert.ecl
> Message-ID: <29d125c2-713b-8c5f-38e2-1b9bbf8fb5c8 at exa.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> Hi Joakim
>
>
> I followed your
> instruction(https://opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/2017-November/001193.html)
> install libecl, but still have the issue plot
> result(https://opm-project.org/?page_id=197&page=6)
>
>   >>  python  summaryplot WBHP:INJ SPE1CASE1.DATA
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>     File "summaryplot", line 55, in <module>
>       from ecl.ecl import EclFile, EclSum, EclGrid
> ImportError: No module named ecl.ecl
>
>
> How to let python know ecl has been installed?
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Rui
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 11:14:22 +0000
> From: Alf Birger Rustad <abir at equinor.com>
> To: "opm at opm-project.org" <opm at opm-project.org>
> Subject: [Opm] Scheduled maintenance
> Message-ID:
> 	<HE1PR0601MB20253FF290F181559FD4F5FAD66E0 at HE1PR0601MB2025.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
> 	
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Dear OPM community,
>
> Our needs are growing, and we need to upgrade one of our servers to a more powerful machine. In doing so, we need to reboot  the machine hosting our home page, mailing list, wiki and Red Hat packages. Hence, we do expect some downtime on all these services tomorrow, but will try to make it swift. Sorry for any inconvenience this may cause you.
>
> Best regards,
> Alf Rustad
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
> information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
> addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
> this message.
> Thank you
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180528/63450b0e/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opm mailing list
> Opm at opm-project.org
> https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Opm Digest, Vol 31, Issue 9
> **********************************



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180529/96b6c703/attachment.html>

From bacetti.abdelmoumen at gmail.com  Tue May 29 11:30:03 2018
From: bacetti.abdelmoumen at gmail.com (bacetti abdelmoumen)
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 12:30:03 +0100
Subject: [Opm] Redhat RPM package with MPI
Message-ID: <CAE09iZwgSHppmUPi8YfjjQMCKoM8hos8RV3t1jJyKWQHxruYUQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello guys

Is there any link to get an complete RPM package of the simulator with MPI?


Regards/Cordialement

Abdelmoumen Bacetti

abdelmoumen.bacetti at sonatrach.dz
bacetti.abdelmoumen at gmail.com
Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/in/abdelmoumen-bacetti-01a46b138/>
&    Researchgate
<https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Abdelmoumen_Bacetti2>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180529/aedc3fc8/attachment.html>

From joaho at equinor.com  Tue May 29 06:48:02 2018
From: joaho at equinor.com (Joakim Hove)
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 06:48:02 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Problem with installing python-ert.ecl
In-Reply-To: <29d125c2-713b-8c5f-38e2-1b9bbf8fb5c8@exa.com>
References: <HE1PR06MB13058697575D1A71E0D1D857AE260@HE1PR06MB1305.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>,
 <29d125c2-713b-8c5f-38e2-1b9bbf8fb5c8@exa.com>
Message-ID: <HE1PR0601MB2363E71C32A460228345C0ECAD6D0@HE1PR0601MB2363.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

>From your traceback it looks like your summaryplot script is not 100% up to date; so please start by updating that. If it still does not work you can come back to me on joaho at statoil.com


Joakim

________________________________
From: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> on behalf of Rui Xu <rxu at exa.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 2:01:21 AM
To: opm at opm-project.org
Subject: Re: [Opm] Problem with installing python-ert.ecl

Hi Joakim


I followed your
instruction(https://opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/2017-November/001193.html)
install libecl, but still have the issue plot
result(https://opm-project.org/?page_id=197&page=6)

 >>  python  summaryplot WBHP:INJ SPE1CASE1.DATA

Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "summaryplot", line 55, in <module>
     from ecl.ecl import EclFile, EclSum, EclGrid
ImportError: No module named ecl.ecl


How to let python know ecl has been installed?


Thanks


Rui

_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
Opm at opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm


-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180529/1dfd402a/attachment.html>

From joaho at equinor.com  Tue May 29 12:34:02 2018
From: joaho at equinor.com (Joakim Hove)
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 12:34:02 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Volume changes: libecl udate required:
Message-ID: <HE1PR0601MB2363734A6EB4DC1774F0DBECAD6D0@HE1PR0601MB2363.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

I have just merged three PR's listed below. Following this merge you will need to update libecl to get correct numerical values for some of the integration tests in opm-simulator. The change is a preparation to change the volume calculation used in OPM.



https://github.com/OPM/opm-common/pull/407


https://github.com/Statoil/libecl/pull/411


https://github.com/OPM/opm-tests/pull/19


<https://github.com/OPM/opm-tests/pull/19>


<https://github.com/OPM/opm-tests/pull/19>


<https://github.com/OPM/opm-tests/pull/19>


<https://github.com/OPM/opm-tests/pull/19>




-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180529/ecba93c8/attachment.html>

From Arne.Morten.Kvarving at sintef.no  Tue May 29 13:52:59 2018
From: Arne.Morten.Kvarving at sintef.no (Arne Morten Kvarving)
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 13:52:59 +0000
Subject: [Opm] OPM on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver)
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0602MB364124ED772A1A462443868CD06E0@HE1PR0602MB3641.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <HE1PR0602MB364124ED772A1A462443868CD06E0@HE1PR0602MB3641.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <AM0PR06MB4209E61E874902861F99D6EBD96D0@AM0PR06MB4209.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

hi,


rushed packages for bionic has been rolled out today. i had to take some shortcuts as mpi is misbehaving on the bionic pbuilder and i really do not have time to look into that right now. thus, i had to disable the execution of tests. i'm really supposed to be working on something else, so shortcut approach applied.


please report back if they work for you.


arnem


________________________________
Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av c berg <carlpaatur at hotmail.com>
Sendt: mandag 28. mai 2018 17.41.41
Til: opm at opm-project.org
Emne: [Opm] OPM on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver)


Hi,


I just tried to install OPM on OPM on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver) following the recipe for 16.04 on the OPM website. Unfortunately it seem like it does not have a 18.04 release file yet. Are there any plans for adding such a release file?


/Carl Fredrik
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180529/a8589aca/attachment.html>

From carlpaatur at hotmail.com  Tue May 29 17:42:36 2018
From: carlpaatur at hotmail.com (c berg)
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 17:42:36 +0000
Subject: [Opm] OPM on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver)
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR06MB4209E61E874902861F99D6EBD96D0@AM0PR06MB4209.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <HE1PR0602MB364124ED772A1A462443868CD06E0@HE1PR0602MB3641.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>,
 <AM0PR06MB4209E61E874902861F99D6EBD96D0@AM0PR06MB4209.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <HE1PR0602MB3641A6171EA8C6AC792944A3D06D0@HE1PR0602MB3641.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

Hi,


It works like a charm on my side. I also created a tutorial when I installed it:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=r1hL1lvwG9c


Enjoy 😊


/Carl Fredrik


________________________________
Fra: Arne Morten Kvarving <Arne.Morten.Kvarving at sintef.no>
Sendt: 29. mai 2018 15:52
Til: c berg; opm at opm-project.org
Emne: SV: OPM on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver)


hi,


rushed packages for bionic has been rolled out today. i had to take some shortcuts as mpi is misbehaving on the bionic pbuilder and i really do not have time to look into that right now. thus, i had to disable the execution of tests. i'm really supposed to be working on something else, so shortcut approach applied.


please report back if they work for you.


arnem


________________________________
Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av c berg <carlpaatur at hotmail.com>
Sendt: mandag 28. mai 2018 17.41.41
Til: opm at opm-project.org
Emne: [Opm] OPM on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver)


Hi,


I just tried to install OPM on OPM on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver) following the recipe for 16.04 on the OPM website. Unfortunately it seem like it does not have a 18.04 release file yet. Are there any plans for adding such a release file?


/Carl Fredrik
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180529/ed8a8de0/attachment.html>

From caranha at cs.tsukuba.ac.jp  Wed May 30 10:38:31 2018
From: caranha at cs.tsukuba.ac.jp (Claus Aranha)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 19:38:31 +0900
Subject: [Opm] Guidelines for running an Eclipse model on OPM-Flow
Message-ID: <fc8987c6-f54c-9a9d-bcb3-0d700705edd1@cs.tsukuba.ac.jp>

Hello!

I'm Claus. In the past few years, I have been researching 
meta-heuristics for Reservoir History Matching using a (very crude)
python wrapper for Eclipse made by myself.

Today I found about the OPM project, and it would be FANTASTIC if I 
could replace Eclipse with OPM on my workflow (or at least do the 
initial development of the optimizers on OPM, and then the final testing 
on Eclipse using opm-ecl).

However, after successfully running the tests and tutorials, I am having 
difficulties running our models on OPM. For example, our simplest model 
fails to run with the error:

"Keyword AQUFET not recognized"
(And indeed, the keyword is not in the OPM manual)

So I was wondering if there is some sort of manual, tutorial or 
guidelines for making ECL models compatible with OPM Flow. I looked 
around the documentation, project page, and the last year or so of the 
mailing list but could not find anything.

Thank you very much!

-- 
Claus Aranha
University of Tsukuba, Department of Computer Sciences
http://conclave.cs.tsukuba.ac.jp     +81 (29) 853-6574


From markus at dr-blatt.de  Wed May 30 11:00:18 2018
From: markus at dr-blatt.de (Markus Blatt)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 13:00:18 +0200
Subject: [Opm] Redhat RPM package with MPI
In-Reply-To: <CAE09iZwgSHppmUPi8YfjjQMCKoM8hos8RV3t1jJyKWQHxruYUQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAE09iZwgSHppmUPi8YfjjQMCKoM8hos8RV3t1jJyKWQHxruYUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20180530110018.vbjif4b36hu62bbv@smaug>

Hi,

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:30:03PM +0100, bacetti abdelmoumen wrote:
> Is there any link to get an complete RPM package of the simulator with MPI?
>

AFAIK package libopm-simulators1-openmpi (for download see https://opm-project.org/?page_id=245) does support MPI, but you have to select OpemMPI on redhat (see https://www.mail-archive.com/opm at opm-project.org/msg01087.html).

Cheers,

Markus
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858


From abir at equinor.com  Wed May 30 11:00:48 2018
From: abir at equinor.com (Alf Birger Rustad)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 11:00:48 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Guidelines for running an Eclipse model on OPM-Flow
In-Reply-To: <fc8987c6-f54c-9a9d-bcb3-0d700705edd1@cs.tsukuba.ac.jp>
References: <fc8987c6-f54c-9a9d-bcb3-0d700705edd1@cs.tsukuba.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <HE1PR0601MB2025724985C462F91B2A8D32D66C0@HE1PR0601MB2025.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Claus,


It seems you already know the answer to your question. You need to use keywords supported by OPM as outlined in the manual. The opm-data and opm-tests repositories contain many example input decks that are supported. Basically, you need to remove unsupported keywords from the deck, possibly replacing them with supported functionality that achieves the same effect.


If you have followed us for a year, you have probably noticed that we add on new keywords and new functionality frequently. AQUFET is currently not planned, but aquifer support is on it's way in these days. You will find an example deck with the soon to be supported keywords here:

https://github.com/OPM/opm-tests/blob/master/aquifer-oilwater/2D_OW_CTAQUIFER.DATA


Patches are welcome, so if you are an experienced developer, you can attempt implementing support for whatever you are missing yourself and contribute it.


Cheers,

Alf



________________________________
Fra: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av Claus Aranha <caranha at cs.tsukuba.ac.jp>
Sendt: 30. mai 2018 12:38
Til: opm at opm-project.org
Emne: [Opm] Guidelines for running an Eclipse model on OPM-Flow

Hello!

I'm Claus. In the past few years, I have been researching
meta-heuristics for Reservoir History Matching using a (very crude)
python wrapper for Eclipse made by myself.

Today I found about the OPM project, and it would be FANTASTIC if I
could replace Eclipse with OPM on my workflow (or at least do the
initial development of the optimizers on OPM, and then the final testing
on Eclipse using opm-ecl).

However, after successfully running the tests and tutorials, I am having
difficulties running our models on OPM. For example, our simplest model
fails to run with the error:

"Keyword AQUFET not recognized"
(And indeed, the keyword is not in the OPM manual)

So I was wondering if there is some sort of manual, tutorial or
guidelines for making ECL models compatible with OPM Flow. I looked
around the documentation, project page, and the last year or so of the
mailing list but could not find anything.

Thank you very much!

--
Claus Aranha
University of Tsukuba, Department of Computer Sciences
http://conclave.cs.tsukuba.ac.jp     +81 (29) 853-6574
Welcome! [conclave.cs.tsukuba.ac.jp]<http://conclave.cs.tsukuba.ac.jp/>
conclave.cs.tsukuba.ac.jp
Welcome! I am Claus Aranha, an assistant professor at the University of Tsukuba, Department of Computer Science.In this page, you can find information about my academic activities.


_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
Opm at opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm


-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180530/bea55a76/attachment.html>

From mlfarias201450 at gmail.com  Wed May 30 11:35:45 2018
From: mlfarias201450 at gmail.com (Manoel Farias)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 08:35:45 -0300
Subject: [Opm] Guidelines for running an Eclipse model on OPM-Flow
In-Reply-To: <fc8987c6-f54c-9a9d-bcb3-0d700705edd1@cs.tsukuba.ac.jp>
References: <fc8987c6-f54c-9a9d-bcb3-0d700705edd1@cs.tsukuba.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <CAEPiYyW2y6y2-z4QrP0bZAUJ_r5+PaunJRYFBT1USMwpSLxYSw@mail.gmail.com>

Dear All,

I agree. I am trying to perform a history match, missing 2 things:

- Analytical Aquifers;

- WCONHIST keyword with 'LRAT' target.

This project is fantastic! I teach reservoir simulation here in Rio and
OPM-flow will be an alternative to run models on my course.


Best Regards,

Manoel

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 7:38 AM, Claus Aranha <caranha at cs.tsukuba.ac.jp>
wrote:

> Hello!
>
> I'm Claus. In the past few years, I have been researching meta-heuristics
> for Reservoir History Matching using a (very crude)
> python wrapper for Eclipse made by myself.
>
> Today I found about the OPM project, and it would be FANTASTIC if I could
> replace Eclipse with OPM on my workflow (or at least do the initial
> development of the optimizers on OPM, and then the final testing on Eclipse
> using opm-ecl).
>
> However, after successfully running the tests and tutorials, I am having
> difficulties running our models on OPM. For example, our simplest model
> fails to run with the error:
>
> "Keyword AQUFET not recognized"
> (And indeed, the keyword is not in the OPM manual)
>
> So I was wondering if there is some sort of manual, tutorial or guidelines
> for making ECL models compatible with OPM Flow. I looked around the
> documentation, project page, and the last year or so of the mailing list
> but could not find anything.
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> --
> Claus Aranha
> University of Tsukuba, Department of Computer Sciences
> http://conclave.cs.tsukuba.ac.jp     +81 (29) 853-6574
> _______________________________________________
> Opm mailing list
> Opm at opm-project.org
> https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180530/6bcc84c0/attachment.html>

From Kai.Bao at sintef.no  Wed May 30 11:46:09 2018
From: Kai.Bao at sintef.no (Kai Bao)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 11:46:09 +0000
Subject: [Opm] Guidelines for running an Eclipse model on OPM-Flow
In-Reply-To: <CAEPiYyW2y6y2-z4QrP0bZAUJ_r5+PaunJRYFBT1USMwpSLxYSw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <fc8987c6-f54c-9a9d-bcb3-0d700705edd1@cs.tsukuba.ac.jp>,
 <CAEPiYyW2y6y2-z4QrP0bZAUJ_r5+PaunJRYFBT1USMwpSLxYSw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <HE1PR0601MB2395D3CBEA3C4BE305197207F76C0@HE1PR0601MB2395.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

Hi, Manoel,


Glad to know your interest in using OPM-flow in your reservoir simulation course.


We do not have the support for Analytical Aquifers yet.


I believe the WCONHIST keywords with `LRAT` target should be supported. But if you saw some problems related to this, would you like to provide a small model for us to reproduce your problem? We would like to fix it whenever time permits.


Best,

Kai

________________________________
From: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> on behalf of Manoel Farias <mlfarias201450 at gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 1:35:45 PM
To: Claus Aranha
Cc: opm at opm-project.org
Subject: Re: [Opm] Guidelines for running an Eclipse model on OPM-Flow

Dear All,

I agree. I am trying to perform a history match, missing 2 things:

- Analytical Aquifers;

- WCONHIST keyword with 'LRAT' target.

This project is fantastic! I teach reservoir simulation here in Rio and OPM-flow will be an alternative to run models on my course.


Best Regards,

Manoel

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 7:38 AM, Claus Aranha <caranha at cs.tsukuba.ac.jp<mailto:caranha at cs.tsukuba.ac.jp>> wrote:
Hello!

I'm Claus. In the past few years, I have been researching meta-heuristics for Reservoir History Matching using a (very crude)
python wrapper for Eclipse made by myself.

Today I found about the OPM project, and it would be FANTASTIC if I could replace Eclipse with OPM on my workflow (or at least do the initial development of the optimizers on OPM, and then the final testing on Eclipse using opm-ecl).

However, after successfully running the tests and tutorials, I am having difficulties running our models on OPM. For example, our simplest model fails to run with the error:

"Keyword AQUFET not recognized"
(And indeed, the keyword is not in the OPM manual)

So I was wondering if there is some sort of manual, tutorial or guidelines for making ECL models compatible with OPM Flow. I looked around the documentation, project page, and the last year or so of the mailing list but could not find anything.

Thank you very much!

--
Claus Aranha
University of Tsukuba, Department of Computer Sciences
http://conclave.cs.tsukuba.ac.jp     +81 (29) 853-6574
_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
Opm at opm-project.org<mailto:Opm at opm-project.org>
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180530/ffc03b0f/attachment.html>

From david.baxendale at gmail.com  Thu May 31 12:57:30 2018
From: david.baxendale at gmail.com (David Baxendale (Private))
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 20:57:30 +0800
Subject: [Opm] Opm Digest, Vol 31, Issue 14
In-Reply-To: <mailman.1.1527681601.9345.opm@opm-project.org>
References: <mailman.1.1527681601.9345.opm@opm-project.org>
Message-ID: <c1287fb6-ee2c-2cb7-dea6-85c8592edcd2@gmail.com>

Manoel,

There is a manual for OPM Flow located here 
https://opm-project.org/?page_id=955.

OPM Flow attempts to use the same keywords as the commercial simulator, 
but naturally it does not have all the features as it's commercial 
competitor so far, but it is getting there. For the aquifer you could 
use grid cells with large pore volumes but you need to scale these 
geometrically away from the reservoir cells otherwise you will have 
large pore volumes from the aquifer blocks flushing through the "small" 
reservoir cells. Another approach is use horizontal wells to simulate 
the aquifer. None of these are ideal, but the former would be similar to 
the commercial simulator's numerical aquifer.

The trend today is not to use analytical or even numerical aquifers but 
to actually include the aquifer in the model. Analytical aquifers were 
included in numerical models in order to provide a link between material 
balance models and numerical models. Engineers would perform the overall 
pressure matching using material balance and then incorporate the 
analytical model into the numerical model.

I too was under the impression that LRAT was supported on the WCONHIST 
keyword. However, the Norne model users RESV option so you can use this 
instead of LRAT. And once you have a pressure match covert over to ORAT 
control. I personally don't like using LRAT as it gives a false 
impression on the quality of the match, and secondly, we have a highly 
level of confidence in the oil volumes through the ticket sales. 
Non-sellable fluids get little attention in the field.
ThunderBird Signature File

Regards, David Baxendale

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 30-May-18 20:00, opm-request at opm-project.org wrote:
> Send Opm mailing list submissions to
> 	opm at opm-project.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	opm-request at opm-project.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	opm-owner at opm-project.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Opm digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>     1. Re: Guidelines for running an Eclipse model on OPM-Flow
>        (Manoel Farias)
>     2. Re: Guidelines for running an Eclipse model on OPM-Flow (Kai Bao)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 08:35:45 -0300
> From: Manoel Farias <mlfarias201450 at gmail.com>
> To: Claus Aranha <caranha at cs.tsukuba.ac.jp>
> Cc: opm at opm-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Opm] Guidelines for running an Eclipse model on OPM-Flow
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAEPiYyW2y6y2-z4QrP0bZAUJ_r5+PaunJRYFBT1USMwpSLxYSw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Dear All,
>
> I agree. I am trying to perform a history match, missing 2 things:
>
> - Analytical Aquifers;
>
> - WCONHIST keyword with 'LRAT' target.
>
> This project is fantastic! I teach reservoir simulation here in Rio and
> OPM-flow will be an alternative to run models on my course.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Manoel
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 7:38 AM, Claus Aranha <caranha at cs.tsukuba.ac.jp>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I'm Claus. In the past few years, I have been researching meta-heuristics
>> for Reservoir History Matching using a (very crude)
>> python wrapper for Eclipse made by myself.
>>
>> Today I found about the OPM project, and it would be FANTASTIC if I could
>> replace Eclipse with OPM on my workflow (or at least do the initial
>> development of the optimizers on OPM, and then the final testing on Eclipse
>> using opm-ecl).
>>
>> However, after successfully running the tests and tutorials, I am having
>> difficulties running our models on OPM. For example, our simplest model
>> fails to run with the error:
>>
>> "Keyword AQUFET not recognized"
>> (And indeed, the keyword is not in the OPM manual)
>>
>> So I was wondering if there is some sort of manual, tutorial or guidelines
>> for making ECL models compatible with OPM Flow. I looked around the
>> documentation, project page, and the last year or so of the mailing list
>> but could not find anything.
>>
>> Thank you very much!
>>
>> --
>> Claus Aranha
>> University of Tsukuba, Department of Computer Sciences
>> http://conclave.cs.tsukuba.ac.jp     +81 (29) 853-6574
>> _______________________________________________
>> Opm mailing list
>> Opm at opm-project.org
>> https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180530/6bcc84c0/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 11:46:09 +0000
> From: Kai Bao <Kai.Bao at sintef.no>
> To: Manoel Farias <mlfarias201450 at gmail.com>, Claus Aranha
> 	<caranha at cs.tsukuba.ac.jp>
> Cc: "opm at opm-project.org" <opm at opm-project.org>
> Subject: Re: [Opm] Guidelines for running an Eclipse model on OPM-Flow
> Message-ID:
> 	<HE1PR0601MB2395D3CBEA3C4BE305197207F76C0 at HE1PR0601MB2395.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
> 	
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi, Manoel,
>
>
> Glad to know your interest in using OPM-flow in your reservoir simulation course.
>
>
> We do not have the support for Analytical Aquifers yet.
>
>
> I believe the WCONHIST keywords with `LRAT` target should be supported. But if you saw some problems related to this, would you like to provide a small model for us to reproduce your problem? We would like to fix it whenever time permits.
>
>
> Best,
>
> Kai
>
> ________________________________
> From: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> on behalf of Manoel Farias <mlfarias201450 at gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 1:35:45 PM
> To: Claus Aranha
> Cc: opm at opm-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Opm] Guidelines for running an Eclipse model on OPM-Flow
>
> Dear All,
>
> I agree. I am trying to perform a history match, missing 2 things:
>
> - Analytical Aquifers;
>
> - WCONHIST keyword with 'LRAT' target.
>
> This project is fantastic! I teach reservoir simulation here in Rio and OPM-flow will be an alternative to run models on my course.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Manoel
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 7:38 AM, Claus Aranha <caranha at cs.tsukuba.ac.jp<mailto:caranha at cs.tsukuba.ac.jp>> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm Claus. In the past few years, I have been researching meta-heuristics for Reservoir History Matching using a (very crude)
> python wrapper for Eclipse made by myself.
>
> Today I found about the OPM project, and it would be FANTASTIC if I could replace Eclipse with OPM on my workflow (or at least do the initial development of the optimizers on OPM, and then the final testing on Eclipse using opm-ecl).
>
> However, after successfully running the tests and tutorials, I am having difficulties running our models on OPM. For example, our simplest model fails to run with the error:
>
> "Keyword AQUFET not recognized"
> (And indeed, the keyword is not in the OPM manual)
>
> So I was wondering if there is some sort of manual, tutorial or guidelines for making ECL models compatible with OPM Flow. I looked around the documentation, project page, and the last year or so of the mailing list but could not find anything.
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> --
> Claus Aranha
> University of Tsukuba, Department of Computer Sciences
> http://conclave.cs.tsukuba.ac.jp     +81 (29) 853-6574
> _______________________________________________
> Opm mailing list
> Opm at opm-project.org<mailto:Opm at opm-project.org>
> https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180530/ffc03b0f/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opm mailing list
> Opm at opm-project.org
> https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Opm Digest, Vol 31, Issue 14
> ***********************************



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20180531/75ce3754/attachment.html>