[Opm] DUALPERM

[Atgeirr Flø Rasmussen]

Dear Henk,

Thanks for sharing your interest in OPM Flow. I believe you are not the only party that would be interested in dual porosity and/or dual permeability, but to the best of my knowledge there is no active development in that direction at the moment. Supporting such development can be for example implementing the feature, writing documentation, or financial contributions.

We could arrange an informal meeting to discuss possibilities.

Atgeirr

________________________________
From: Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> on behalf of Henk van Oeveren <Henk.van.Oeveren at ennatuurlijk.nl>
Sent: 14 March 2023 07:16
To: opm at opm-project.org <opm at opm-project.org>
Subject: [Opm] DUALPERM

Dear,

I am using OPM flow for geothermal development. We are operating 10 geothermal wells, and are expanding.
For certain cases we would strongly benefit from a DUALPERM model.
We would like to investigate what happens if cold water seeps down through fissures, would it slow breakthrough?
We can plan wells accordingly.

How am I to recommend such an implementation to OPM? Can I support in any way?

Kind regards,

Henk van Oeveren
Sr. Project leader geothermal/Reservoir engineer