[Opm] Problem with injecting field voidage replacement

[Stephen, Karl D]

Hi Kai,
For completeness, I removed the final WCONINJE keyword and the reference to FIELD in the GCONINJE keyword to be more consistent with the SPE9 case. Bw=1 again.

-- Days   dd/mm/yyyy                FPR             FVIR             FVPR
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
   0.00   01/01/2020               4500                0               -0
   1.00   02/01/2020            4495.02            11000          11499.4
   4.00   05/01/2020            4483.38            11000          11499.3
  13.00   14/01/2020            4450.86            11000          11499.4
  40.00   10/02/2020            4353.57            11000          11499.6
  97.50   07/04/2020            4149.48          11000.1          11499.5
 148.75   28/05/2020            3965.53          11000.2          11498.8
 200.00   19/07/2020            3781.38          11000.2            11497
 298.64   25/10/2020             3432.1          11000.4            11487
 400.00   04/02/2021            3086.74          11000.5          11468.6
 500.00   15/05/2021            2766.78          11000.6          11440.7
 600.00   23/08/2021             2505.6          11000.7          11358.2
 700.00   01/12/2021            2504.02          10997.4          10997.4
 800.00   11/03/2022            2518.26          10945.8          10945.8
1000.00   27/09/2022            2557.13          10960.5          10960.4
1200.00   15/04/2023            2573.25          10810.6          10810.6
1400.00   01/11/2023            2574.08          10699.4          10699.4
1600.00   19/05/2024            2559.59          10575.9            10576
1800.00   05/12/2024            2562.13          10470.6          10470.6
2000.00   23/06/2025            2564.31          10385.1          10385.1
2200.00   09/01/2026            2566.22          10317.3          10317.3

The result is initially identical with FPR etc. but once water breaks through, there are differences.

If anyone has another case that successfully tests field voidage replacement that would be great.

Karl
________________________________

Heriot-Watt University is The Times & The Sunday Times International University of the Year 2018

Founded in 1821, Heriot-Watt is a leader in ideas and solutions. With campuses and students across the entire globe we span the world, delivering innovation and educational excellence in business, engineering, design and the physical, social and life sciences. This email is generated from the Heriot-Watt University Group, which includes:

  1.  Heriot-Watt University, a Scottish charity registered under number SC000278
  2.  Edinburgh Business School a Charity Registered in Scotland, SC026900. Edinburgh Business School is a company limited by guarantee, registered in Scotland with registered number SC173556 and registered office at Heriot-Watt University Finance Office, Riccarton, Currie, Midlothian, EH14 4AS
  3.  Heriot- Watt Services Limited (Oriam), Scotland's national performance centre for sport. Heriot-Watt Services Limited is a private limited company registered is Scotland with registered number SC271030 and registered office at Research & Enterprise Services Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS.

The contents (including any attachments) are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of its contents is strictly prohibited, and you should please notify the sender immediately and then delete it (including any attachments) from your system.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: TUT1G1_SPE9.DATA
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 6043 bytes
Desc: TUT1G1_SPE9.DATA
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20190315/dc586ef5/attachment.obj>