[Opm] Typical Run-time for SPE10

[Kangqiao Hu]

Thanks Alf for the explanation. If I want to replace the current solver
with a custom one, where is a good place to start with? Is
NewtonIterationBlackoilInterleaved.cpp where the solvers are actually
defined?

Regards
Kang

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Alf Birger Rustad <abir at statoil.com> wrote:

> Hi Kang,
>
>
> The short answer is that flow does not support running the model yet. The
> long answer is that SPE10 Model 2 is a two-phase upscaling study, and hence
> by nature not fond of the preconditioning routines used by default in flow
> (or some of the commercial simulators for that matter). The most obvious
> remedy to this is to exploit the fact that SPE10 Model 2 is a two-phase
> case, and to use algebraic multigrid based preconditioning. We just very
> recently landed a true two-phase simulator version of flow, which actually
> supports an AMG based linear solver. Adapting the deck to this reality may
> finally make SPE10 Model 2 run well with flow.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Alf
>
> ------------------------------
> *Fra:* Opm <opm-bounces at opm-project.org> på vegne av Kangqiao Hu <
> kangqiaohu at gmail.com>
> *Sendt:* 14. august 2017 05:13
> *Til:* Opm at opm-project.org
> *Emne:* [Opm] Typical Run-time for SPE10
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am running spe10 model2 using flow with single thread on a Intel
> i7-7820hk mobile processor, and the simulation has been running for more
> than 4 days and it seems to be far from complete. I was wondering what is
> the typical time of running this test case? Thanks!
>
> Regards
> Kang
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
> information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
> addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
> this message.
> Thank you
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <//opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/attachments/20170821/f6e7ea63/attachment.html>